The Dems culture war is at odds with their party-of-women talking points. An issue on which Democrat women are increasingly divided. Good. The rose-colored prescription glasses (UK) need to come off because they’ve never cared about you, and the Smithsonian’s latest leap proves it.
Interim [American Women’s History Museum] director Lisa Sasaki told The New York Times that “transgender women” — AKA men pretending to be women — will be included in the potential new museum which has already received millions in funding because its “inclusivity” defines what the homage to American women is all about.
Will there be a special exhibit featuring the first time a biological male robbed an actual woman (XX) of a job, opportunity, small business loan, government grant, cabinet position, or trophy?
How about beauty pageant losers – that’s destined to start happening soon enough. Nothing espouses the talent and beauty of women more than a biological man winning such a competition.
Literally, anyone can claim a place…
They simply have to “identify” as a woman while having made some contribution to American society deemed historic by the powers that be with this museum.
Nonetheless, the museum has yet to receive congressional approval, but it has raised $55 million in donations from benefactors such as Melinda Gates, Bill Gates’ ex-wife, The Alice Walton Foundation, and more wealthy philanthropists.
The group already has online features up and running. It features the likes of “Sylvia Rivera” who co-founded “the militant group and youth shelter STAR (Street Transvestite Action Revolutionaries).” A search for conservative icon and actual woman Phyllis Schlafly yields nothing.
…unless they are actual women who accomplished things the American Women’s History Museum (or its progressive director) finds ideologically distasteful.
Does the museum require these men who are women to have had surgery to remove their man parts, or is this a standard culture war op? If they felt like a woman when they did it, that counts.
And no distinctions? Right, is there a section for women who aren’t even American or, better yet, non-American men who identify as women that happen to be in America? Anything for the men identifying as women who rape biological women in the ladies’ bathroom, locker room, or prison laundry? You might not be able to find the firsts, but there are likely to be some who are more prolific than others.
And no, none of this is transphobic. No one I know is afraid of transgenders. The few with legitimate issues can easily earn our compassion. Mental health issues suck and on an individual basis, it’s no different than accepting a preferred nickname or form of address.
The concern centers on the danger to actual women from predators abusing the progs system and the consensus that not being able to accept yourself gives you a right to get the government to force others to conform to your worldview.
As Rick likes to say, you can invite me to your princess party, but I don’t have to go.
The Smithsonian has decided you do, at least you will if you walk through the doors of the as-yet-approved institution. It only exists online for now and in the near future.
Perhaps if it set up shop in Ukraine it would already be fully funded and emitting carbon to celebrate men making women’s history. Wait. That wouldn’t work. Ukraine is intolerant of the LGBTQ agenda.
