After years of politicizing clean air and water, it is only a matter of time before the Left argues against both, and they will. China is their template. A polluting, uncaring superpower praised for its response to climate change.
Related: Democide: Blocking Ivermectin Likely Cost 800,000+ American Lives
A response that is ruining the air and water in China while doing the same in third-world countries mining rare earth metals for the race to net-zero freedom – as in no liberty, much like in China. So, it’s no surprise they’ve bad-mouthed drugs like Ivermectin and supplements like vitamin D.
The evidence suggests that both are cheap, helpful prophylactics that aid your immune system in resisting the flu plague they’ve released across the land. We’ve discussed why they hated on Ivermectin at length. If there is viable existing treatment, the FDA can’t issue emergency use authorization. The map dots lead you to the only possible conclusion, and so it is with vitamin D3.
There have been repeated threats that the FDA plans to regulate the wild-west vitamin supplement industry but not over the potential for malfeasance or fraud – and not that the FDA doesn’t want to keep its monopoly on both. Supplements might put roadblocks between you and their public health industrial complex utopia.
Vitamin D3 might be the Cherubim with the flaming sword.
But there is no shortage of research on the benefits of Vitamin D supplementation to the human immune system. Experts say, add Zinc, C, and a few others – assuming you can’t and don’t get enough through a healthy diet – and you are donning the immune system equivalent of the armor of God. It’s not foolproof and may not be suitable for everyone (ask a medical professional you trust if you can find one), but it’s right enough that the Left has hated on it – which is always a giveaway.
The ruling class (led by Democrats) is good at telling what scares them.
Vitamin D scares them because it is safe and effective and fosters independence from socialized medical mandates. To make matters worse, a ten-year study was just released that suggests vitamin D therapy can reduce incidents of dementia by 40%.
The large-scale study (with over 12,000 participants) spanned ten years — so there’s lots of data over a lengthy time frame that the corporate media is going to have a hard time refuting. In the conclusion, the researchers implored the scientific community to build upon their findings in future research, with more specific analysis of the intriguing differences in the dementia-fighting benefits of vitamin D by sex (women experienced a greater benefit than men).
Wait a minute. Vitamin D knows more about biology than Supreme Court Nominees (it can tell the difference between biological men and women!). That’s something! Perhaps the Left should discredit it with accusations of bigotry but be careful.
Vitamin D supplementation might be what people of color need as a first line of defense against flu, SRV, Pneumonia, COVID-19, and even common colds. Generations of ancestors helped develop darker skin to protect them from an environment with so much sunlight, while our shared ancestors who migrated north paled so their bodies could create more vitamin D with less sunshine. Their bodies can’t produce enough of it where the sun is less direct, as in much of the US.
In other words, scaring people of color away from vitamin D may put their health at risk (racist!), but then so would scaring them away from Ivermectin, and the “experts” keep doing that.
Maybe they are hoping for a rise in dementia as well to keep everyone mentally close to the progressive norm.
