America’s Forcefeed (us) Drugs Administration (FDA) approved the New and Improved™ bivalent boosters (OMG, they’re “Bi?”) after reading about the reimbursement check potential from big Pharma. Could we expect better for injecting 6-month-old babies? Nope.
Talk about adding a new definition to the term ‘booster seat.’I have no idea what motivated FDA to issue an emergency use authorization for BA.4/BA.5 Bivalent boosters (OMG, they’re “Bi?”). There were no human trials, and even the rat trial was underdone. And we only have their word they tested it on a handful of rats which, after the past two years, isn’t worth a thing.
But here we are, adding babies to another human test trial for an experimental pharmaceutical product descended from the deformed mRNA family tree. From Dr. Nass.
FDA authorized bivalent booster for 6 month olds after only a 3 day review of Pfizer documents – It seems FDA is not even trying to pretend it is following any of its standards, let alone following the Science.
Talk about redefining the term “booster seat.”
Actually, FDA authorized both the Moderna and Pfizer bivalent boosters for kids 6 months through 5 years today. It had already authorized them for everyone else. Don’t expect the new boosters to work, however.
One thing the FDA has learned. If there’s little to no evidence to hide, you do not have to keep it hidden because no one can find what does not exist.
There is the matter of public health, but we can say without much fear of contradiction that this is no longer why the CDC or FDA exists. Their new role is to maximize revenue opportunities for connected individuals and organizations (including political parties) regardless of the health risks, so I think a few edits to the “about FDA/what we do page” are in order.
Here’s the current bullshot.
The Food and Drug Administration is responsible for protecting the public health by ensuring the safety, efficacy, and security of human and veterinary drugs, biological products, and medical devices; and by ensuring the safety of our nation’s food supply, cosmetics, and products that emit radiation.
Are they doing any of this, and (to be honest) have they ever? It seems like a dereliction of duty is job one, and they have only recently behaved like some unemployed 45-year-old divorcee who gave up trying to hide the decline.
The current FDA mission isn’t even close to what they do, so I invite our readers to craft a new one.
If we like them, we’ll publish a few.
