Another 420 lives have been consumed by the vaxxasaurus. Sixty deaths every day over one week. And no, it’s still not getting reported the way it should
In the same seven days, there were an additional 15,834 office visits, 2,297 hospitalizations, four prolonged hospitalizations, 419 life-threatening reactions, and 771 were permanently disabled.
420 deaths.
Locally, the fear train keeps rolling as New Hampshire media gleefully reports new cases, hospitalizations, and deaths but no VAERS data. On Sept 13th, we published a first look at VAERS at the NH level. You can read that here.
Related: A First Look at How Many Granite Stater’s May Have Been Harmed or Died From COVID19 Vaccinations
As promised, we are also providing the other perspective on the case and death rate data. What it looks like demographically in the Granite State.
Synopsis: In the past two weeks, your odds of being hospitalized or dying from a positive case of COVID 19 in New Hampshire were the same (very low) or declined.
And because it’s back-to-school scaremongering season, you should know that there was one case of covid in the hospital over the last 14 days where the patient was under 20 years of age—no deaths in this age group.
If masks worked, we should have seen significantly higher numbers because many districts do not require them.
Not much of a plague, is it?
There have been a total of 30 cases (**positive tests) during hospitalization of someone under 20 in New Hampshire over 564 days of state reporting.
Here’s the complete updated demographic breakdown by age/population.
And there were only eight new cases reported/hospitalizations in New Hampshire in the past two weeks for anyone under the age of 70.
That’s a headline all its own.
How many were overweight or had other comorbidities? All of them? We don’t know, but the history of this virus suggests most or all.
*VAERS data is voluntarily self-reported by doctors, hospitals, so those numbers are likely all undercounted.
**Testing is still remarkably unpredictable and inaccurate.
