The June 10, 2021 passage of HB 220, “AN ACT relative to medical freedom in immunizations and establishing a committee to examine the policy of medical intervention including immunizations,” is anything but what its title indicates.
It is unconscionable because it authorizes State-sanctioned coerced experimental vaccination of vulnerable populations. I believe that it is not merely unconscionable, but it is a violation of the Nuremberg Code.
I encourage the public to examine the roll call votes, in the House and Senate, recorded for HB 220 on the General Court website.
We want to thank Tejasinha Sivalingam for this Contribution. If you have an Op-Ed or LTE
you want us to consider email us at Editor@GraniteGrok.com.
First, let me familiarize you with why I believe the Covid Countermeasures, including the vaccines, are violations of the Nuremberg by pointing you to a petition I wrote and have been circulating titled “Cancel Covid,” which may be read here.
Second, let’s be clear that the Covid-19 vaccines are experimental. If you read the “Fact Sheet for Recipients and Caregivers” for the Pfizer and Modern vaccine (most recently revised on 25 June 2021 and Jun/24/2021 respectively) and located on the CDC website, they both clearly read as follows.
“There is no U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved vaccine to prevent COVID-19” (page 1, both). “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is still being studied in clinical trials,” and “The Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine is still being studied in clinical trials” (page 4 and page 3 respectively).
So, the Nuremberg Code lists several protections against medical experimentation, but one of them is the absolute necessity of informed consent. Consent without coercion is essential in medical experimentation.
Now, let’s turn to the text of HB 220. First, the new statute speaks to your right to “accept an immunization”, not decline an immunization. A complete contradiction to the title, very clever verbiage.
Second, paragraph II clearly itemizes, one by one, the vulnerable populations the legislators are willing to sacrifice to State-sanctioned coercion and violations of bodily integrity. The list includes school-aged children, mentally ill individuals, the medically incompetent, the elderly in county nursing homes, individuals seeking care at State hospitals and medical facilities, and finally inmates.
Even if you don’t fit into any of those groups, for example, if you are Religiously opposed to vaccinations, or are at least Religiously in favor of informed consent; you too can and likely will be coerced in time by the commissioner of the department of health and human services through quarantine, which is again validated by HB 220.
Since I personally sent a copy of the petition mentioned above, explaining the elements of the Nuremberg Code, to legislators and the governor; and since the vaccine is admittedly experimental at the time of passage of HB 220; I believe every member of the NH General Court who voted for the passage of HB 220 are culpable for violations of the Nuremberg Code, and all harm done by vaccines administered in accordance with this new statute.
