We broke the seal on the Hampton school district the other day with a story about Superintendent Lois Costa, sorry, Dr. Lois Costa (probably the same way Jill Biden is Dr. Jill Biden). She had a link to some equity garbage on her district web page.
The very next day, the link was gone.
Not terribly proud of your commitment to CRT in all its forms? That’s telling. Where did you hide it? We know it’s still embedded in the culture and the curriculum.
And you didn’t give up that easily, but maybe this will help.
I stumbled upon the SAU90 anti-bullying policy. It looks like the policy in every school district across the state because it apes the state statute (RSA 193-F:3).
But first, (emphasis Mine)
193-F:2 Purpose and Intent. –
I. All pupils have the right to attend public schools, including chartered public schools, that are safe, secure, and peaceful environments. One of the legislature’s highest priorities is to protect our children from physical, emotional, and psychological violence by addressing the harm caused by bullying and cyberbullying in our public schools.
II. Bullying in schools has historically included actions shown to be motivated by a pupil’s actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, ancestry or ethnicity, sexual orientation, socioeconomic status, age, physical, mental, emotional, or learning disability, gender, gender identity and expression, obesity, or other distinguishing personal characteristics, or based on association with any person identified in any of the above categories.
III. It is the intent of the legislature to protect our children from physical, emotional, and psychological violence by addressing bullying and cyberbullying of any kind in our public schools, for all of the historical reasons set forth in this section, and to prevent the creation of a hostile educational environment.
IV. The sole purpose of this chapter is to protect all children from bullying and cyberbullying, and no other legislative purpose is intended, nor should any other intent be construed from the enactment of this chapter.
Source. 2000, 190:1. 2010, 155:1, eff. July 1, 2010.
Teaching innocent children that they are racists because of their skin color is mental abuse based on race, color, ethnicity, and ancestry. Teaching other children to perceive them as racists not only foments bullying in violation of the law. It is systemic, pervasive, and premedicated.
Related: Hampton NH – SAU90: “Equity” Propaganda Featured on Superintendents Web Page
CRT in a school curriculum defines a bullying culture in contradiction to state law no matter what was passed in the state budget. An imbalance of power is being created by the people tasked with protecting them from bullies.
From 193-F:3 (5) (b) “Bullying shall also include actions motivated by an imbalance of power based on a pupil’s actual or perceived personal characteristics, behaviors, or beliefs, or motivated by the pupil’s association with another person and based on the other person’s characteristics, behaviors, or beliefs.”
One more point. Whistleblowers are protected.
193-F:7 Immunity. – A school administrative unit employee, school employee, chartered public school employee, regular school volunteer, pupil, parent, legal guardian, or employee of a company under contract to a school, school district, school administrative unit, or chartered public school, shall be immune from civil liability for good faith conduct arising from or pertaining to the reporting, investigation, findings, recommended response, or implementation of a recommended response under this chapter. The department of education shall be immune from civil liability for its good faith conduct in making recommendations under this chapter.
Parents and taxpayers need to get their hands on the curriculum. Comb through it looking for evidence of CRT, SEL, and any Equity-based learning programs. If the Administrative leader is willing to brazenly hid her support, then the rest of the district is probably already doing that.
Don’t let them.
And just in Hampton.
