Dear Mr. Neumann,
Pursuant to the Right-To-Know law (RSA 91-A), I am requesting public access, within 5 business days, to the governmental records reasonably described as follows:
On April 27, 2021, you sent the responsive documents to request 2021-515, but there appear to be some missing records. I was unaware that this email address was corrupted, and I would not have assumed that the City cybersecurity was in such peril.
Your response to my March 8, 2021 request stated:
Is your request only for those emails which are readily available (e.g. not subject to initial and legal deletion, unintentional deletion, file corruption, etc), or is the request made with the presumption that it can and should be satisfied verbatim?
To further understand the IT email situation, I am requesting more email records:
- Please provide all email communications relative to assessing matters between the IT department and Ms. Kleiner for the time period of January 1, 2021, through April 1, 2021.
- Please provide all email communications relative to assessing matters between Ms. Kleiner and Mayor Donchess or his Chief of Staff for the time period of January 1, 2021, through April 1, 2021.
- Please use search words assessing, abatement, Laurie, Ortolano, corrupt, important, and assesshelp. The search word “assessing” should produce broader records, and I want the broadest record sweep possible for matters involving the assessing office. I do not want the search limited by the secondary words “abatement, Laurie, Ortolano, corrupt, important and assesshelp.” These words are only there to assist in making sure the search is broad.
- Please provide all email communications relative to file corruption matters between the IT Department and Ms. Kleiner.
- If there are corrupted emails within this search, please provide electronic copies of the corrupted emails. Please note, I have no idea what this means nor would ever write such a request had you not provided the phrase in your original response to my assesshelp email request.
- Please provide copies of emails not subject to initial and legal deletion as you called out in your responsive email for assesshelp emails. Please note, I have no idea what this means nor would ever write such a request had you not provided the phrase in your original response to my assesshelp email request.
Per RSA 91-A:4 IV(c), If you deny any portion of this request, please cite the specific exemption used to justify the denial to make each record, or part thereof, available for inspection, along with a brief explanation of how the exemption applies to the information withheld.
Thank you for your lawful attention to this matter.
