I will no longer accept the phrase “common sense” coming from anti-gunners as a euphemism when their aim really is to infringe on our Second Amendment Rights. We can no longer let the Left to play word games anymore.
It’s the reason why “I will not Comply” T-Shirts are becoming such the rage (see what I did there?) in the Second Amendment community. It’s people like this self-righteous incompetent that believes he’s all-knowing about the differing types of guns and how they’re used – and is dead wrong. Pew-pew, my butt! Yet, this guy thinks he’s a self-appointed genius in trying to tell the rest of us how this gun is different from that gun solely by how you swing said gun.
This is pathetic. But, funny.
Virginia @DelegateMark (a Bloomberg-owned "Gun Sense Champion") introduced HB961 to ban "assault weapons."
A town hall attendee asked him to define "assault weapon." Bloomberg’s “champion” spewed garbage for 7 min & couldn't answer the question. pic.twitter.com/7DbwZ4csNd
— NRA (@NRA) January 26, 2020
I can’t WAIT to see him describe pistols.
If you can’t even bother to take the time to actually, you know, learn the area in which you wish to legislate, especially in the 2A area where there are already over 20,000 laws infringing on the few words of the Second Amendment (and Article 2A here in NH), please, just shut up and sit down. Get in front of someone who actually KNOWS what guns are, what guns do, how guns work, and which guns are used for what purpose – or purposes. Learn something.
And get your facts straight! I get it – you WANT to infringe, just like NH State Rep Katherine Rogers, in as many ways as possible to disarm us all. We understand that you’re for any means possible infringements in sub-classing guns into a category that doesn’t exist (assault weapons), that “weapons of war” is an easy political gambit for confusing those of the electorate that have never even held a gun and then “Othering them”, and that the lethality of guns is only determined by how they look – black and scary
Sidenote: just like Progressives define “diversity” – solely by the color of one’s skin rather on your manner of thought and capabilities
We see that you want to infringe on our right to keep our arms in taxing both any kind of gun and the ammo needed to use them with. And oh, by the way, laughing at us by legislating that we can keep our guns – but we’ll deny you the rounds needed to shoot them. Do you think we don’t know the game you’re playing?
Or with legislation like SB469, use any possible means to infringe on where we can shoot, too. I just looked at that bill again – it keeps the “1 shot every two seconds” requirement for a range, it still kills off any range grandfathering RSAs that protected ranges now in force, and still allows any town to enact any kind of noise control ordinance they want to where any range can be shut down by a single shot (indoor OR outdoor – the verbiage doesn’t distinguish between them). The Founders are just rolling – NOISE used as an infringement.
And it still has onerous financial penalties and subjects the owner/operator to both civil AND CRIMINAL penalties. Infringement by financially bleeding gun owners to death.
So go and infringe on what gun you are “allowed” to have, infringe on the ammo you might be able to and “allowed” to buy (and/or how much at one time), infringe on how you can keep them at home.
All because some yahoo is swinging his arms around like he’s a kid playing Army back in the day.
(H/T: Breitbart Politics)
