Court: California’s Ten Round Magazine Limit Violates Second Amendment

Knee-jerk legislating is a hallmark of the Left. Pick a feature of a firearm and Democrats have jumped at the opportunity to limit, prohibit, or completely ban them. When Magazine bans were all the rage states like New York and California rammed them into law. California’s has just been overturned.

In Duncan vs. Becerra, … Judge Roger T. Benitez of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California determined …that California’s ban on commonly possessed firearm magazines violates the Second Amendment. …

Judge Benitez rendered his opinion late Friday afternoon and handed Second Amendment supporters a sweeping victory by completely invalidating California’s 10-round limit on magazine capacity. “Individual liberty and freedom are not outmoded concepts,” he declared.  

Because states cannot ban commonly used firearms the second amendment also protects commonly used components of those firearms, according to Judge Benitez. Magazines that hold more than ten rounds are widely used and available.

The State of California is expected to appeal to the 9th circuit which is well known for passing judgments that are later overturned by the US Supreme Court. So, this is not the end. But it’s a decent middle.

| NRA-ILA

Author

  • Steve MacDonald

    Steve is a long-time New Hampshire resident, award-winning blogger, and a member of the Board of Directors of The 603 Alliance. He is the owner of Grok Media LLC and the Managing Editor, Executive Editor, assistant editor, Editor, content curator, complaint department, Op-ed editor, gatekeeper (most likely to miss typos because he has no editor), and contributor at GraniteGrok.com. Steve is also a former board member of the Republican Liberty Caucus of New Hampshire, The Republican Volunteer Coalition, has worked for or with many state and local campaigns and grassroots groups, and is a past contributor to the Franklin Center for Public Policy.

    View all posts
Share to...