Rumor has it that every New Hampshire State House Rep. was supposed to have received this message today.
From: <withheld>
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 1:59 PM
To: ~All Representatives
Subject: Block mnomination
Please block the nomination of Judge Neil Gorsuch for Supreme Court Justice. He is unwilling to state his views on many important issues
Thank you
<withheld>
New London,NH
Sent from my iPad
Where do I begin?
The iPad wielding emailer asked every member of the New Hampshire House to oppose the nomination of Judge Neil Gorsuch. No one in the New Hampshire House has a vote. No one in the US House has a vote. Nominees get confirmed in the US Senate.
The emailer’s subject: Block mnomonation.
Democrats are nothing if not bitchy should you spell something wrong so this should have them in high dudgeon. But I don’t think we’ll hear a peep. Instead, someone will discover proofreaders are a right and offer legislation to demand that every property owner allows anyone self-identifying as an editor regardless of biological sex to review the writing on the wall of either bathroom.
Perverts will see this as an open invitation to dangle their “participles” in the ladies room.
I will give the email’s author points for brevity. But we should weep for the taxpayers who paid a small fortune for the public education that produced this deficient grasp of both civics and punctuation.
On a positive note, they can hardly do any damage if they limit themselves to asking State Representatives in New Hampshire to intervene in the advice and consent powers of the United State’s Senate.
On a negative note, this was probably sent during an MSNBC commercial break or while searching for protesting jobs on Craig’s List.