Will Democrats Reward The Bosses who gave them Corrupt Hillary?

by

Guest post for Dave Rivers:

Grassroots Democrats can’t be happy with the Democrat Party establishment who saddled them with a Presidential nominee who has a 30 year record of scandals and is now the subject of an active FBI investigation which could result in an indictment and conviction.

No one, not Democrats and not Republicans, wants our country in the position it is in, with the possibility of electing a President who will ultimately be shown to have committed perjury, violated the espionage act, or other major crimes.

And now we learn that it’s not just Hillary who is under FBI investigation but the Clinton Foundation is also under FBI investigation by at least four different FBI offices, for a variety of possible crimes.

Millions of Democrat primary voters rejected Hillary, perhaps concerned about her many scandals and apparent corruption, and voted for Bernie Sanders or other candidates. New Hampshire Democrats overwhelmingly preferred Bernie to Hillary, 60%-38%. Yet, the New Hampshire Democrat party establishment rejected the Democrat voters’ choice and cast their “super-delegate” votes for Hillary.

The Democrat establishment over-ruled Democrat voters in other states as well. Ultimately Hillary won more states and votes than Bernie, but one wonders what would have happened in a fair election.

Now we know that the Democrat National Committee interfered with Bernie’s fund raising, tipped off Hillary’s campaign with Bernie’s plans, and did everything possible to help Hillary defeat Bernie.

Now we know that major “news” figures from almost every major media outlet strategized together and coordinated to ensure Hillary’s victory by publishing articles from Hillary’s campaign, allowing her campaign to edit/kill/approve articles, by killing adverse articles, and even by tipping Hillary off about forthcoming Town Hall and debate questions.

Without all the Democrat establishment’s help for Hillary, Bernie Sanders might be the Democrat Presidential nominee and our country and voters would be considering a scandal-free Democrat Presidential candidate.

In New Hampshire, Maggie Hassan, Annie Kuster, Jean Shaheen, Ray Buckley, Joanne Dowdell, Kathy Sullivan, and Billy Shaheen cast their “Super-Delegate” votes for Hillary, totally rejecting the overwhelming choice of Democrat voters, Bernie Sanders.

Will New Hampshire Democrats sweep these people, who ignored their wishes and showed such bad judgment, from office and replace them with people with better judgment and integrity? Or will New Hampshire Democrats reward / re-elect the people who so totally ignored their wishes and stuck them with such a problem-plagued Presidential candidate?

Author

Share to...