Clintonian Feminism – “Special Place in Hell” Edition

jahannam-large
“I was shown the hellfire and that the majority of its dweller are women” (who didn’t support Hillary) -The Prophet Mohammad

Being a Clinton supporter means never having to say you’re sorry…for what Bill Clinton has done to women. You don’t have to say you’re sorry for anything Hillary did either, which works out great because while there is a special place in hell for women who do not help other women, there is a special place in the White House for the woman who did not help the women whom Bill Clinton put through hell.

And according to Madeline Albright, if you don’t help get that woman in to the White House, there is a special place in hell for you, young lady.

So much for modern feminism as a bastion for the ‘Choice’ argument.

It’s Hillary or Hell, which is a distinction without a difference to Bill and anyone not supporting Hillary, but that is hardly the worst thing to crawl from the maw of the pasty-white previous-former Secretary of State under Bill Clinton (try to un-see that!). Madeline Albright’s remarks, or those of her Muppet impersonator–another distinction without a difference–were dripping with added feminist irony that mostly went unnoticed. Everyone seems caught up with the “special place in hell” reference–and it is a nice place to get caught up, but what about this (emphasis mine)?

“The story is not over, they’re (Republicans) going to want to push us back. Appointments to the Supreme Court make all the difference,” Albright said of Republicans, adding that young women “have to help” and that “Hillary Clinton will be there for you.”

Tell that to Monica Lewinsky, Juanita Broaddrick, Kathleen Wiley, Paula Jones, Gennifer Flowers et al. Hillary was there for them the way a speeding bus is there for the poor bastard who just stepped off the curb. All because Bill wanted to give them the ‘thumbs up’ if you catch my meaning.

As an aside, if the progressive ‘campus rape’ culture ever became chic enough to have its own T-shirt thirty years from now (the way violent communism has Che today) it would not surprise me to see 21st-and-half-century clueless-brick-tossing-anti-globalist-equivalents wearing short-sleeved cotton shirts (assuming cotton hasn’t been banned by progressives as racist) with an artsy monochromatic picture of Bill Clinton on it.

Buy one in blue and you get a free cigar.

No one will really know the back-story, but then that’s the point with Che, and its most certainly the point with Hillary. Everything about Hillary’s backstory suggests that she represents every damn thing the founders warned us about all rolled up into one.

And to get back on point, yes, Hillary has been there for young women…who can be intimidated, bought off, or kept quiet. But the moment you step off the pant-suit plantation you are dead to her, perhaps even literally.

But it’s always been that way with Democrats. You are not gay, black, transgender, female, a mom, or whatever unless you are that and a registered Democrat. Victim class protections do not translate if you are not on board the progressive mother-ship.

Bill Clinton is the master of ceremonies on the mother ship, the poster child for the exceptions and provisos clause to rape culture, and Hillary is his gun moll. So we ought to be able to say that while they’ve been around a few blocks a time or two, that this is why young Democrat women are flocking to Sanders; but most of them don’t know anything about Bill’s sexual assault history, or know it as a construction of the vast right wing conspiracy, from the gospels according to Hillary. But if either of those is true, this means that the real reason these Democrat women are not ready for Hillary is because she’s Hillary.

 

Share to...