So, how’s that Brand working out fer ya, eh? Not only what appears on the recording from last Wed night, but mostly what was said after I shut it down. And yes, you will not see the person who didn’t want to be recorded nor hear their words; you see, I keep my word:
There was another person who wants to keep his Republicanism on the down low because “of what I do” – he was lurking in “the other room. That’s their decision – but I can disagree with it. Now, there was a more robust discussion of public / private after the camera shut off. I dryly note that near the end of the meeting, it was said by the Chair (paraphrased) “we need to be a bit more quiet as they may hear us in the public bar area” – which was “hidden by view” by a rather flimsy room separater. So much for being a “private meeting”, eh?
Any Democrat tracker would have had no problem using a digital audio recorder in getting that all – or a “representative of the media” who would be so predisposed. At least I present the WHOLE thing so that ANYTHING taken out of context to be twisted can be shown in its full context. I keep saying that ANY Republican speaking at ANY forum or in ANY place had better have a camera going to protect themselves from that twisting. Better still, have a second camera scanning the crowd looking at those recording your candidate.
How the heck do you think we’ve out trackers publicly?
