This is very cool…
"We’re inviting New Hampshire’s bloggers, reporters, citizens and campaign officials — anyone who is covering and shaping the primary in ways which weren’t possible a decade ago — to join the forum," says Bill Densmore, director of the New England News Forum. "This is a town meeting about new forms of civic engagement."
From the event signup page:
The Internet is an emerging mass medium — a press without a press. How are candidate websites, blogs, mashups, meetups, social networks, citizen reporters and online fundraising affecting political dialog in the New Hampshire primary?.To find out, the New England News Forum, Southern New Hampshire University, the Marlin Fitzwater Center at Franklin Pierce University and other sponsors are convening a public inquiry entitled: "The Unpress: New Gatekeepers of the New Hampshire Primary?" — Thurs., Dec. 6, 2008, from 6 p.m. to 9 p.m. at SNHU in Manchester, N.H.
Click here for further information. Panelists for the event include one of my favorite liberals– one-time Democratic gubernatorial candidate and present talk radio & TV talk show host Arnie Arnesen and one of my "go-to" guys for political observation and insight here in the Granite State, James Pindell of the Boston Globe.
.
According to the website, the evening centers around seeking yes or no answers to three questions.
Participants will consider informally three propositions:.
As the gatekeeper role of the traditional press falls away, our democracy is more hopeful, more transparent and more accountable. Yes, or no? Candidates now spend more time working the grassroots, because they need to influence the web conversation as well as the main-stream media. The result: Clearer issues, more discussion, more diversity. Yes, or no? The Internet cannot alone close the loop on political engagement because it lacks the capacity to project a handshake, it does not replace face-to-face campaigning, and raises difficult questions about trust and conflict-of-interest. Yes, or no?
What do YOU think? The first two are easy. "Yes" works for both. The third, not so. While I agree that it cannot replace, only compliment personal contact, I don’t necessarily think it "raises difficult questions about trust and conflict of interest." No more than a telephone or any other communication tool used by the various campaigns. Feel free to post your thoughts in the "comment" section below.