Ping4Deals – a new venture for Jim Bender

In the last Senatorial election cycle, I ended up talking with Jim Bender quite a bit on the trail.  A gentleman and a hard worker, his line from the Seacoast Republican Womens’ debate as stayed with me (the best line of the campaign, in my opinion) in his description of the chuckleheads in DC; "self-assured … Read more

It isn’t just the taxes that is a wet blanket on the economy

The estimate is that our Govt has placed an additional cost, via regulations, of $1.75 Trillion.  It is also clear that the Obama Administration has no problem in adding more and more: (H/T: Big Government) Even as GE’s CEO Jeffrey Immelt tried to tell other CEOs to start hiring (he is an economic advisor to … Read more

Data Point – who has more money in the bank?

US Government operating cash balance: $73.8 Billion. Apple?  $76.3 Billion. It seems that private industry, having to watch over their own money, can be more "successful" than Government at watching its money.  Imagine that; while Apple is among the most successful companies in the world right now, our elected politicians and bureaucrats have now shown … Read more

The Boehner Debt Ceiling Bill: compare the Pressers

First, from Congressman Frank Guinta (R-NH) who was supported, in large measure, by NH TEA Party and 9/12 Project leaning folks: “By voting to cut spending at a deeper level than we raised the debt ceiling, the House has taken an important step toward fiscal responsibility.  Our best opportunity for doing that was the Cut, … Read more

GrokTalk! Saturday July 30, 2011

Live Streaming local and National News with opinion you could only get from GraniteGrok.

EMail: GrokTALK@GraniteGrok.com  or Call us! 

603-524-7478

This week, 9-11AM…

Grokster Mike will be join Skip as co-host with topics:

Michael Patrick Leahy, TEA Party activist and author,  will be joining us to talk about his new book, "I, Light Bulb: A Death Row Testimonial".  Back in 2007 under President Bush, the Republicans passed an energy law that by mandating that Americans could purchase light bulbs meeting certain standards, the Federal Government decided that the American people were too dumb to "make right decisions" regarding their lighting needs so 100 watt incandescent bulbs will be illegal (efforts are still underway to reverse that mandate by the Nanny State).  A small item, perhaps, but it shows the growing intrusiveness into the free marketplace.

NH State Rep George Lambert
will be coming back to talk about an idea of getting  NH into a precious metal currency that was mention at The Lobby.  While the site is none too friendly to Conservatives or Libertarians, they grudgingly said "Dismiss Lambert at your peril" – heh, we welcome him with a smile to talk about his idea: "Live Free or Die Bucks". 

 

 

 

 

We all Be TEA Hobbits now (hates nasty McGollum)!

 

 

 

Live streaming: (after the jump)

Read more

To Parody my GPS: “I have arrived?”

Several folks sent this to me or onto other Groksters asking if I knew anything about this message they were getting starting around 2:30pm:

My responses that I sent back to thse folks were akin to:

  • Heh!  This could be fun!

    Thanks for letting me  know.

  • Hahahahaha!  You’re the second person in the last 5 minutes to let me know……

It could get "interesting"…..  Who knows?  We’ve been outing RINOs lately…could be that.  Or, just about anything else….

That’s life…

  • Dunno – You’re number 3 to let me know.

    Tell you the truth, I think it’s a hoot!  If someone wants to waste their time to do a parody of me, I guess I should feel rather special!

    Hmmm, maybe I should listen to folks like you and <redacted> et al – perhaps I do have a bigger voice than what I am willing to admit to.  Guess this would kinda prove what you guys have been saying and to which I’ve been pooh-poohing…..

    (gleam in eye, smile on lips) This could be rather amusing….

  • Hahahaha!  That is #4!

    I already went to the Twitter page and looked at it.  I’m going to screen shot it and post it up, but I think this is funny as all get out!

    Such silliness, to think that ordinary schlub me is worth of a parody????  Me, of all people?  I think this is hysterical!

So I went to the Twitter account:

You all know that old saw about Flattery et al, so as I said before (in other words) "Thank you".  I truly look forward to see the brilliance that will be forthcoming from the person (or people) behind this idea!  After all, if you’re going to go through the trouble of setting this up, taking the time to start following 78 folks, one HAS to believe that they have a storehouse of witticisms just ready to unleash to amaze and fill us with insights that are just not possible from we ordinary mortals.  After all, it would be a very poor parody to go this far and then just go "poof!" – how disappointed I would be to be deprived of the bon mots and great turn of phrases that are implied in setting this up.  Look, if you’re going to sling and blog, you have to be ready to field the incoming with a smile and a sense of humor, so this should be fun. 

Oh wait!  Methinks s/he/they may be running out of steam already.  I noticed that both the "Following you" and the site had a "Following = 78" for both.  Then I did so again just before 9pm:

Read more

Nancy Pelosi: We’ll take care of your parent so that you don’t have to

Right from the mouth of one of the biggest Progressives around: former Speaker Nancy Pelosi who decided to use that argument over raising the debt ceiling (thus allowing Democrats to spend even more).  Face it, who wants to shoulder the responsibilities of taking care of family members.  After all, they’re only your parents!  After all, there are things that only Government can do – you cannot!

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said that she views her role in politics as an extension of her role as a mother.

At a Capitol Hill press conference on Thursday, Pelosi was asked whether there was still time enough for Congress to work out a deal to raise the debt ceiling by next Tuesday, Aug. 2.

Pelosi said, “Look, I am a mom and a grandmother.  I view my work in politics as an extension of my role as a mom.  There are things we want to do for our children that are simply beyond us.”

“The safety of the food they eat, the water they drink, the air they breathe, the society in which they live, safety and the environment, and the neighborhoods in which they live,” she said.   “You need to have a public role, even though raising your family is a very personal thing.”

Right.  A personal thing.  Read the following – what part of "very personal" doesn’t seem to have some part of Government attached to it?  Government has to do all that?  Are you getting the same visualization I am – Government is the security blanket that we all can’t do without – or let go?  Or is it Nancy’s version the kind that comes with extra long sleeves with leather trim, with those fancy buckles?

Pelosi went on to say that it was important to maintain Social Security and Medicare and other government programs so that people will not have to care for their parents as they care for their children.

I’m confused.  First, does Nancy believe that…

Read more

Islamophobia

Islam:the religious faith of Muslims including belief in Allah as the sole deity and in Muhammad as his prophet; the religious faith of Muslims including belief in Allah as the sole deity and in Muhammad as his prophet (Mirriam-Webster) Phobia: a persistent, irrational fear of a specific object, activity, or situation that leads to a … Read more

A note from Sarah Palin for the Frosh in Congress

From the politician who best knows how to use Facebook: Out here in proverbial politico flyover country, we little folk are watching the debt ceiling debate with great interest and concern. Today I re-read the open letter I wrote to Republican Freshman Members of Congress in November 2010, just days after they were ushered into … Read more

Who is the real NO?

Well, sir, where is YOUR plan?  Oh, just TALKING about having a plan?  

Letter Sent From the Bedford Money Club to all NH state representatives Regarding the Debt Ceiling Debate

July 25, 2011

Letter Sent to State Representatives and Senators

RE:  The Debate About Raising The U.S. Debt Ceiling

Dear US Representatives:

This letter is the first in a series that communicates the position of tax paying members of the Bedford, NH Money Club on a number of pressing issues before the U.S. Congress.  The Bedford Money Club is a women’s financial literacy group affiliated with the Women’s Institute for Financial Education (WIFE.org)—the oldest non-profit dedicated to improving the personal financial literacy of women.  The Club eschews politics, but felt compelled to write these letters because we are appalled at how poorly governments are being managed at all levels in this country.  As citizens of a “donor” state that receives $0.71 for every $1.00 we send to Washington, we’re especially unhappy about the current situation.

Our first letter expresses our position on the debate concerning raising the U.S. debt ceiling.  We have been told that raising the U.S. debt ceiling is essential to preserving the AAA credit rating of the United States of America.  Consequently, we support raising the U.S. debt ceiling.  However, our support is contingent upon Congress immediately implementing significant budget and deficit cuts, rather than delaying these cuts until after the 2012 election year. You work for us, and we want to be in a position to fire you in 2012 if you fail to shrink the budget and debt as we have requested.  We do not want our country in this financial position ever again.  

We further explain our rationale in the letter that follows.

1. Don’t increase our National Debt:  The U.S. Debt Ceiling has been raised 80 times since 1940, and each time, policy makers have failed to take steps to bring spending in line with what the country can afford without becoming enslaved to foreign governments that might use this leverage against our national interests.   Raising the debt ceiling makes it harder for Americans to retain our freedom and control over how our money is to be spent.  Also, we lack confidence that our representatives will follow any increase in the U.S. Debt Ceiling with significant cuts to current and future budgets that would lead to a permanent reduction of this debt.  If you raise the debt ceiling, we want budget and deficit cuts to be made prior to any increase in taxes or tax code reform to offset any increase in the National Debt.  We do not want these cuts deferred or delayed.  We want smaller government now, not ten years from now.

2. Don’t Jeopardize the AAA Credit Rating of the United States and the U.S. dollar as the world’s Reserve Currency

 

Read more

Gosh, and I thought that Harry Reid would have LOVED the plan – look!

TEA Party Principles: Stop the spending, Fiscal Responsibility, Free Markets, Rule of Law

We worked hard to get the best people in place that would carry those principles forward.  This IS the defining moment – do we let the Progressives ruin us financially, making our kids and grandkids slaves to the debt they have poured onto us, or do we stop the insanity and stop the growth of government?

Which translates to: will the Republicans, especially in the House, stand on principle or will it be the usual DC compromise?  Read this from Cato and you can easily guess:

The Boehner plan also doesn’t cut spending in a more fundamental way. It doesn’t lay out any particular programs or agencies to terminate. I’m in favor of spending caps as a secondary enforcement mechanism, but actual cuts have to come first. A caps-only plan like Boehner’s just kicks the can down the road. At best, it simply nudges future legislators to actually cut something specific.

Why doesn’t the House leadership propose real cuts? They’ve certainly got the resources and expertise to do the job. A single senator — Tom Coburn — produced a 620-page report last week detailing hundreds of programs to cut and terminate. Coburn and his staff read through thousands of articles and reports on the real-world performance of federal programs, and they made a good case for each particular cut they proposed. 

So, does the below chart show that DC has gotten the message and stopped the spending via the Boehner plan? No  Current deficit spending is $1.5 Trillion (give or take).  Does the Boehner plan stop the bleeding?    No.  The Rs are touting $3 TRILLION CUTS!  Er, over 10 years.  Translation – $300 Billion / year.  That’s IF later Congress’s stick to it…they don’t have to.  This STILL means deficit spending of $1.2 Trillion / year.

This is not what the TEA Party fought for in November – just more of the same with the Rs not convinced they have the power (even as the House Rs control the actual Purse Strings) to stand up and stand strong.  Once again, we see the wimp factor snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. Once again, we see the GOP action (their votes) failing to meet their philosophy (limited government).

With no respect meant for Harry Reid, this is the reason why I would have chuckled to himself ("those rube Republicans – I STILL get to spend lots!")":

 (H/T: Cato)

Even more charts showing in what bad shape we are in here.

They were sent to do a job –

Read more

Notable Quote – Sen. Jesse Helms

“Compromise, hell! That’s what has happened to us all down the line — and that’s the very cause of our woes. If freedom is right and tyranny is wrong, why should those who believe in freedom treat it as if it were a roll of bologna to be bartered a slice at a time?” – … Read more

Conservatives believe that the best form of welfare is a job. Govt thinks otherwise.

"Throughout history, poverty is the normal condition of man. Advances which permit this norm to be exceeded — here and there, now and then — are the work of an extremely small minority, frequently despised, often condemned, and almost always opposed by all right-thinking people. Whenever this tiny minority is kept from creating, or (as sometimes happens) is driven out of a society, the people then slip back into abject poverty.

This is known as “bad luck.”

– Robert A. Heinlein

I sat and read "Atlas Shrugged" a couple of summers ago for the first time.  My friend Chan (of WeekendPundit – I always read his Thoughts on a Sunday) warned me to have some kind of anti-depressants around as I read through the first 100 pages or so.  Thought that advice was a bit of an exaggeration.

I was wrong.

Since Obama’s inauguration,  how the Congress has neglected the Constitution more and more and shucked off its law making responsibility, and Federal agencies seem to want to make law by executive fiat more and more in larger and larger contexts, I have become more and more distraught.  Indeed, some are of such consequence, they should be the result of Congressional action, debated in the open, instead of by unelected and unaccountable bureaucrats. This is the Progressive technocrat state and not the governance model promulgated by our Founders. The parallels between what has been building up over the last few decades in our Government and the plot in Atlas Shrugged (even if overdrawn over too many pages) is scary.

This story, of Ronnie Bryant, has gone viral. David McElroy has this story of a coal mine operator that decided to "go Galt", the essence of the book.  Which means, instead of operating his business and providing good paying jobs and providing the fuel that keep our electric lights on, he has had enough:

…Mine operators and state environmental officials say the mine can be operated without threatening the water supply. Environmentalists claim it will be a threat.

I’m not going to take sides on that environmental issue, because I don’t know enough to stake out an informed opinion. (With most of the people I listened to today, facts didn’t seem to matter as much as emotional implications.) But Ronnie Bryant wasn’t there to talk about that particular mine. As a mine operator in a nearby area, he was attending the meeting to listen to what residents and government officials were saying. He listened to close to two hours of people trashing companies of all types and blaming pollution for random cases of cancer in their families. Several speakers clearly believe that all of the cancer and other deaths they see in their families and communities must be caused by pollution. Why? Who knows? Maybe just because it makes for an emotional story to blame big bad business. It’s hard to say.

After Bryant listened to all of the business-bashing, he finally stood to speak. He sounded a little bit shellshocked, a little bit angry — and a lot frustrated.

My name’s Ronnie Bryant, and I’m a mine operator…. I’ve been issued a [state] permit in the recent past for [waste water] discharge, and after standing in this room today listening to the comments being made by the people…. [pause] Nearly every day without fail — I have a different perspective — men stream to these [mining] operations looking for work in Walker County. They can’t pay their mortgage. They can’t pay their car note. They can’t feed their families. They don’t have health insurance. And as I stand here today, I just … you know … what’s the use? I got a permit to open up an underground coal mine that would employ probably 125 people. They’d be paid wages from $50,000 to $150,000 a year. We would consume probably $50 million to $60 million in consumables a year, putting more men to work. And my only idea today is to go home. What’s the use? I don’t know. I mean, I see these guys — I see them with tears in their eyes — looking for work. And if there’s so much opposition to these guys making a living, I feel like there’s no need in me putting out the effort to provide work for them. So as I stood against the wall here today, basically what I’ve decided is not to open the mine. I’m just quitting. Thank you.     

So, 125 families will go without a paycheck and continue dependency on Daddy Government.  Fuel that we need to keep the lights on will not keep those lights on; no energy means no ability to do work.  As David observed:

Read more

Guest post by Mac Kittredge: The NH GOP is Forging Ahead Without an ‘Easy-Button’.

To the Editor,                                                                                                                               
The premise of an article in the Nashua Telegraph  (“State GOP facing trouble in paradise” 7/25/2011), is that the New Hampshire GOP, despite overwhelming victories in the legislature and the Executive Council, is basically floundering in Concord, nearly out of cash and rife with “. . infighting and back-stabbing.” It also opines that Governor Lynch’s job-approval ratings should have diminished far more, given the “. . . huge political advantage in the House and Senate.” Really? Does the author think that the luster of NH’s premier ribbon cutter is a good metric for measuring results in the legislature and Executive Council? Or that Republicans forgot that they were sent to Concord to get results and restore fiscal sanity, not to merely polish or tarnish reputations?

A close reading of the article shows naked partisanship by the unidentified author. This collection of carefully tailored facts set among unsupported allegations and hearsay assertions; (i.e. no details on the polls, where taken, questions asked, etc.) are clearly chosen to put Republicans in a bad light.

Why else report on a State GOP account balance, from several months ago, when the current balances are much more substantial? Why play with the timelines, if the article is supposed to take the pulse and viability of the NH GOP now? Why hint and wink about “back-stabbing” without presenting any detail or juicy evidence? I invite voters to carefully review this rancid political suppository for themselves (it’s almost all innuendo) and to then consider the rest of the story.
For example:

The basic premises of the article are patently false. Having a charming, popular, and largely statist Governor Lynch is not ‘paradise’ for the GOP. On election day,…

Read more

Share to...