News – Politics – Opinion – Podcasts
Skip And this time, it was about the partisanship in Washington DC. And this time, he decided to pick on Rush Limbaugh. Who, of course, has a great sense of repartee: Limbaugh added that it is “noteworthy” that Obama “exempts himself from any of the reasons for partisanship.” “Poor Obama,” he said. “Most powerful man in … Read more
Ellen’s post here. In other words, “you have to be one of OUR special kind of women”….and that depends solely on their own special definition of “inclusive” (which doesn’t seem to be that to most people). I guess you have to be a “Progressive” to “get it”. But do they “get” the optics of what … Read more
“Why Do You Always Bring It Back To Race?” Heh – must see TV. Up until a little while ago, I had a negative (not dismal, just slightly negative) view of Carlson – no longer. With the advent of his own show on Fox News, he’s becoming a must watch for what seems to be … Read more
Instapundit: Boy, I know that I am getting up in years, but I’ve talked with Ben Carson. That really doesn’t look like him at all. Wrong guy, wrong department. And we are supposed to rely and trust the MSM? #FakeNews or #DumbEditorsAtSlate ?
Really! Because you are successful, the Concord Monitor judges you to be EEEVVVIIIILLL simply because INCOME INEQUALITY! Yep, just go that Marxist route of just because your ability is there, it must go to someone else because of their need (reformatted, emphasis mine).
Editorial: Tax reform must target inequality
Sunday, January 15, 2017
First, they start off with a joke (it HAS to be a joke, right?)
From Breitbart, we see that one thing has not changed during President Whiny Pants’s term in office – he’s never to blame (emphasis mine):
On Friday’s broadcast of “Dateline NBC,” outgoing President Barack Obama reflected on his past eight years and why he was unable to accomplish as much as he had set out to accomplish after being sworn in as president in 2009.
As he has had in the past, Obama put some of the blame on conservative talker Rush Limbaugh and some host at the Fox News Channel, which he said made it difficult for Republicans to go along with some of his policy proposals.
“Well what is true is the ability of Republican leaders to rile up their base, helped along by folks like Rush Limbaugh, some commentators on Fox News I think created an environment in which Republican voters would punish Republicans for cooperating with me — that hothouse of back-and-forth argument and really sharp partisanship I think has been harmful to the country.”
In other words, our “I have a pen and a phone” President, who famously said that he was better at the jobs of everyone that worked for him, can’t admit that he LOST in the Arena of Ideas. So put it another way – Rush and perhaps four other people at Fox blocked him and his policies? Really, the most powerful man in the free world was stymied by people who just TALK for a living? What does that say about Obama’s:
Both of them were Democrats.
Keith Ellison is the US Rep from Minnesota and the first Muslim elected to the House. He is now in the running to become the Democrat National Committee Chair (as his two predecessors were caught red handed throwing the Dem Prez Primary to Hillary over Sanders). His campaign rhetoric is certainly lacking in historical accumen
Minnesota Rep. Keith Ellison, who once proposed a black-only nation and is now a leading candidate to be the next Democratic National Committee chairman, told supporters Friday that President-elect Donald Trump is bringing white supremacy back to the White House.
‘CADILLAC PRICES FOR YUGO RESULTS’
The more things don’t change…I said similar things during my time on my hamlet’s Budget Committee while evaluating our School District’s budget – it was always a case of that old joke “Go ahead, find the boots”*. I’ve been off the BudComm for a few years now but nothing has changed – lower enrollements and higher costs. As I said during a BudComm meeting last week, it seems that the School Board is not working for the taxpayers and protecting their tax monies but an active agent for the teachers union.
Anyways, that above quote is from the current BudComm Chair Norm Silber – and I agree with it totally (and glad he’s one of our NH House Reps):
Gilford Budget Committee chairman criticizes amount spent on schools
By GAIL OBER, LACONIA DAILY SUNGILFORD — Gilford spends $22,000 a year on each of its students, but ranks in the middle of the state on standardized tests, and that’s made Budget Committee Chairman Norman Silber unhappy.
It SHOULD make every taxpayer unhappy – including slobberin School Board sycophants (and educators) Joe Wernig and Debra LaLiberte (who revisted her political sashaying and posturing (I gotta resurrect that video of her literally impolitely sashaying and berating the BudComm) – I guess NO BudComm Chair or member is every good enough for her. It is either “give the School Board all that they want” or the highway. That haughty arrogance both abounds and suffuses through the whole Edu-Industrial Complex. And then you wonder how they have public school costs the same or much higher than private schools?
And here’s the Yugo part:
“…he shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed“
As always, I try to struggle to watch the Sunday talking head shows as there are sometimes some decent nuggets to be heard (remember, most of the people on here are Progressives and Liberals – I listen to see how they actually think). In one of the middle segments, Chuck Todd is talking with US Diane Feinstein (D-Californistan / Mexifornia) and this popped up about the impending Inauguration of Donald Trump:
Feinstein: …and there is so much fear in this country. I come from the biggest State, get 10s of thousands of phone calls, and emails, from people that are fearful of what is going to happen. It is the job of this new President to reassure people that he is just not the President of his base but he is the president of everyone and that means a coming together.
Notice how she slips in that false premise. That aside, what IS the job of the President? Most of our readers know this
All of these Sunday talk shows have a panel discussion during their shows – and that’s pretty much why I watch. This time, quite the reveal. Beside the host of Meet The Press, Chuck Todd (who pretty much stayed out of this back and forth), the people involved in this discussion were:
Sidenote: I really hadn’t heard Pletka before – hopefully we’ll see her more often
The discussion swung to the topic of the President-elect (and soon to be President) Trump’s penchant to use Twitter as a communications tool. It is clear that the MSMers (Todd, Goldberg, Cooper) are all aghast that a person in that office would speak out, speak out often, and (their real ax grinding) going around them. Cooper starts it off with a slight against Trump (emphasis mine):
Cooper: …The idea that the President of the United States is going to be having tantrums on Twitter whenever someone gets under his skin I think is frightening to a lot of people…
This is the paranoia of TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome). He’s not even Prez yet and he’s absolutely driving the Left to bed-wetting. It has to be the leftovers, in part, of KNOWING that Hillary should have been The One – and isn’t. But that bit about a “tantrum” – it will return in a moment.
When you lay down policies that would have adverse results on a given business, Democrat politicians get upset when it’s shown that these same Democrats:
So, Philadelphia Mayor Jim Kenney was all aflitter about “saving his city’s citizens” from the most WORST plague imaginable:
Soda
Pop, Fizzies. Or, as they used to say when I was growing up – tonic. Yep, after solving all of his city’s problems of great import, he decided that he had to save them all from themselves. Regardless of whether they thought that they “needed” to be saved. Once again, the Progressive “tell” of “You don’t need that.” From Reason the sad tale of “I will social engineer you to make you better”:
Philly Mayor Blames ‘Price Gouging’ for Outrage Generated by City’s New Soda Tax
Businesses are passing along the cost of the tax to consumers, because that’s how taxes work. Someone get Jim Kenney an economics textbook.After driving up the cost of soda and other sugary drinks with a new tax, the mayor of Philadelphia is now trying to blame businesses for charging higher prices (and for the outrage those prices have generated).
Funny, I thought he was elected to run the city – not their lives. But that’s what Progressivism is.
What I don’t get about Socialists / Progressives is that they hold two beliefs at the same time:
Must be hard going though life stupid. And then vicious when they want to fulfill #1 and run into #2. Dan Mitchell, an economics guy that I have quoted from time to time (note: must do more often) has this to say that they are going to get worse: The Left’s Siren Song of Coerced Equality (reformatted, emphasis mine):
Traditionally, folks on the left favored a conventional welfare state, which revolved around two components.
- Means-tested programs for the ostensible purpose of alleviating poverty (e.g.., Medicaid, food stamps, welfare, etc).
- Social-insurance programs for the ostensible purpose of alleviating sickness, unemployment, and aging (e.g., Social Security, Medicare, unemployment insurance, etc).
This agenda was always a bad idea for both macro and micro reasons, and has become a very bad idea because of demographic changes [i.e., fewer workers to support those not working -Skip]But now the left has expanded its goals to policies that are far more radical. Instead of a well-meaning (albeit misguided) desire to protect people from risk, they now want coerced equality. And this agenda also has two components:
Upon receiving the Presidential Medal of Freedom from Obama, Joe Biden was trying to make nice in return. Kinda missed the mark, dontcha think? “I never once doubted that your judgement was flawed. Never once.” Heh! (H/T: RedState)
There are several fundamental concerns with the presumption of a wise, benevolent policy process. It treats the knowledge embedded in an economist’s simplified model as though it were complete knowledge. It ignores the ways that markets adapt to solve problems. And it presumes that when the political process goes to work on problems, it arrives … Read more
(H/T: Powerline)
“The question we ask today is not whether our government is too big or too small,but whether it works — whether it helps families find jobs at a decent wage, care they can afford, a retirement that is dignified.” – President Obama, Inauguration (2009)
And as government gets bigger and tries to do more and more, it works less well at all of it. You can thank Progressives for that. This, however, just beggers the imagination – seriously, govt workers have to be taught that lying is bad???? Emphasis mine:
Orange County: government workers were not on clear notice not to lie in court, falsify evidence
“Using taxpayer funds, government officials in Orange County have spent the last 16 years arguing the most absurd legal proposition in the entire nation: How could social workers have known it was wrong to lie, falsify records and hide exculpatory evidence in 2000 so that a judge would forcibly take two young daughters from their mother for six-and-a-half years?”
Lying is wrong. Period. Full stop. Bad, bad, bad. But seriously, after hearing for years that govt workers are smarter, more sophisticated, and just plain better than most of us in the private sector. While one anecdote can prove little, this is telling me that government workers ARE better at something – being immoral. Think about it – when is lying moral (especially in a courtroom)?
As I’ve said before, TMEW and I owned a small business – one that was HIGHLY regulated: a daycare center. We KNOW regulations, good, meh, and “are you freaking serious?” And we were beseeched on all sides by all kinds of “regulators” that absolutely were convinced that they knew what was best for our business – but it didn’t matter how much money, time, or aggrevation it would have cost as they never had to bear the consequences of their actions on us.
For me, Bernie Sanders epitomizes how the Left views small businesses. How is their attention span or internal worldview of them any different than the feudal aristocracy’s of the emerging merchant class back in the Middle Ages?
“The cultural chasm between the left and middle America extends beyond that to the left and their total lack of understanding of what it means to run a business — particularly a small business — in this country. The video exchange below between Bernie Sanders and a small business owner is eye opening. It’s only about 2-1/2 minutes long so watch it all.
The man begins by saying he’s a small business owner and says Obama’s regulations and taxes are like “getting kicked in the teeth.” He asks why Obama is so against the business owner.”
This is exactly why
I am SO sick of this guy constantly being the Antagonizer-in-Chief. At almost each and every turn, in almost every speech and interview, he just seems to delight in putting the shiv in and twisting it just that much more. Thankfully, the straw(man) season is just about over and we won’t have to listen to this stuff again (at least as President):
But we’re not where we need to be. All of us have more work to do. After all, if every economic issue is framed as a struggle between a hardworking white middle class and undeserving minorities, then workers of all shades will be left fighting for scraps while the wealthy withdraw further into their private enclaves.
Either:
If the Hollywood set wants to churn out movies that make sport of my interests (“Miss Sloane”), campaign for someone (Hillary) that stands for NOTHING that I believe in, and then decides to browbeat me simply because my political outlook does not match mine, that their “patting ourselves on the back” celebrations become Leftist political rallies, I can only have one reaction.
Prof. Victor Davis Hanson, one of my favorite authors to read, has a piece over at The Corner where he tries to get a handle on what Trumpism, the political philosophy, might be. I think that a lot on the Right, even as we might wish a more rigorous system, can agree on it without saying “am I being a sellout to orthodox Conservativism”? Read the whole thing but here a few of the paragraphs / pull quotes that caught my eye (reformatted, emphasis mine):
What Exactly Is Trumpism?
…The Republican Washington–to–New York establishment is alienated by Trump. It finds his behavior reckless and his ideology unpredictable…That he has now brought them more opportunity for conservative political change than any Republican candidate in a century only adds insult to their sense of injury.…there are no Trump political philosophers…
Nonetheless, from the 2016 campaign and from President-elect Trump’s slated appointments, past interviews, and tweets, we can see a coherent worldview emerging, something different from both orthodox conservativism and liberalism, though certainly Trumpism is far closer to the former than to the latter…
Tradition
Trumpism promotes traditionalism. Trump showcases “Merry Christmas!” because his parents did. He believes in dressing formally and being addressed as Mr. Trump. And he insists that his children be well-behaved and polite.
