Skip

“The question we ask today is not whether our government is too big or too small, but whether it works — whether it helps families find jobs at a decent wage, care they can afford, a retirement that is dignified.” – President Obama, Inauguration (2009)

Awe sheesh.  Liberals and Progressives HATE it when we want to cut even a single sacred dollar out of a budget. “It’s an apocalypse!” they decry; “how ever can government run with such a cut!”.

Sidenote: Doubt me?  Come to our Budget Committee meetings later on this fall – I can almost get that reaction on demand.

Yet, when we conservatives and “less government is better govt” types start pointing out that things aren’t quite working out as these spenders predict, they either try to gloss over it and get it off the table or exclaim “you hate children, you Nazi” (ok, perhaps a bit of hyperbole on that first one). But why appropriate $$$ for stuff that gets bought to sit and rust (emphasis mine, reformatted)?

Federal Agencies Spent $13.5 Million on Vehicles They May Not Use

Two federal agencies spent $13.5 million to maintain 2,441 vehicles they may not need, a congressional watchdog reported Tuesday. “Given the billions of dollars spent annually to operate and maintain federally owned vehicles … it is critical for agencies to have sound fleet management practices,” the Government Accountability Office report said.

Read more

SHOT: California’s Chief Justice Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye letter to Dept of Homeland Security (emphasis mine):

As officers of the court, we judges uphold the constitutions of both the United States and California, and the executive branch does the same by ensuring that our laws are fairly and safely enforced. But enforcement policies that include stalking courthouses and arresting undocumented immigrants, the vast majority of whom pose no risk to public safety, are neither safe nor fair. They not only compromise our core value of fairness but they undermine the judiciary’s ability to provide equal access to justice. I respectfully request that you refrain from this sort of enforcement in California’s courthouses.

CHASER: DHS Secretary John Kelly(and USMC General) on “sanctuaries” and, ahem, courthouses (emphasis mine):

“The best place for us to pick up these illegal criminals is in jails and prisons. It is inconceivable to me that an elected official at any level would prefer these types of men and women to be released into the community…Sheriffs and police departments “want to cooperate with us and turn these people over that are in the jails.”

“If they don’t do that, we have to go into neighborhoods. We have to go into courthouses. We have to go where we can find them and apprehend them.”

These illegal aliens that are being picked up have

Read more

“I’m disappointed that both the original posting and response violated the principles of GraniteGrok.“

That was my first interaction with Zandra Rice-Hawkins – she almost Alinsky’d me during McCain’s run for Prez when she was fronting for the Socialist-all-in union called the SEIU.  I took a picture of one of her “I’m a healthcare voter” voters – frankly a lard-ass holding two plates of food lumbering across the backyard and Zandra didn’t like it that I put her picture up even as I had blurred out her face.  Zandra attempted to use Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals #4:

“Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entity’s very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)

I ended up calling HER out instead for lying and misleading people and since 2007 when that post was written, she has continued, as Trump might say, continued to be “Lyin Zandra”. IMHO, it fits.

And now Zandra Rice-Hawkins wants to stalk Alinsky Gov. Chris Sununu?

Read more

…I never saw “Social Construct” staring back at me from the other end of my microscope(s).  Frankly, Saturday’s “March for Science” was dumb, unscientific, and completely devoid of any Principles that were drilled into my head as to how REAL science operates.  That line of that shirt is a complete nullification of hundreds of hours spent as a lab rat getting high on formaldehyde and other obnoxious chemicals.  In fact, that line IGNORES science completely.

Nope, from my perspective, this is yet another example of how Socialists / Progressives have politicized yet another area of life. What now matters is the narrative instead of scientific Truth.  All those whiners were doing were despoiling the good name of Science and showed the rest of us that Science now, in large measure, getting down on your knees and begging Government to be even bigger and throw more money at them.

Leeches, Remoras – I see no difference between those two sucking parasites and those that marched in the streets.  Both of them have one and only one purpose in life: live off of others. They turned from the Scientific and to the Political.

Treat them as such.

(H/T: Powerline)

Oh yeah, this was pretty good:

Read more

A chart from SharylAttkisson.com seems to be pretty much on the mark:

“Please note that outlets on left and right sometimes publish material that’s on the opposite side of the political spectrum, or that has no political leaning at all. The placement is based on perceived overall tone and audience. Position on the chart doesn’t necessarily imply credibility or lack thereof. Sources on far right and far left have, in many instances, produced excellent, factually correct information at times.

Read more

But as always, “mo’ money, mo’ money, mo’ money” is needed when two simple letters strung together would suffice (but that would require self-control and self-responsibility; two former ideals that were considered to be virtuous in our pre-Progressive past).  From an article titled “Amid gonorrhea outbreak, health officials urge for thorough STD screenings”, the Concord Monitor decided that personal behavior wasn’t at fault here for skyrocketing (and “unexpected!”) rates of STDs.  Nope, a preventative “no” never enters into their equation – after all, “urges” must be consummated in our no boundaries / no regrets morality, right?  Nope, here’s the reason why this article caught my eye (picked apart here, reformatted and emphasis mine):

…The sexually transmitted disease had reached outbreak levels in New Hampshire, according to the department. Between 2007 and 2013, the disease had stayed level at about 130 cases per year. Then, in 2016, the department got 465 reported cases – a 250 percent increase. “The amount of increase has certainly been surprising to us,” said State Epidemiologist Dr. Benjamin Chan. Chan and his office are now conducting research to figure out why more people are contracting the disease, but there are other STD increases to worry about. From 2011 to 2015, cases of chlamydia in the Granite State went up by 22 percent and syphilis rose by 81 percent.

It’s not just New Hampshire; America’s STD rates are at an all-time high, according to the Centers for Disease Control. Doctors and public health officials attribute the increase to a few different factors, including lack of access to health care and screening and a decrease in condom use and people having multiple partners.

Well, gollllllly – multiple partners, eh?  Who’d a thunk it?  Yet,  the “reason” totally escapes them?  Yet, they won’t blame that as the Numero Uno problem with this epidemic,

Read more

All it takes is one question over and over and over again.  And then the guts to act when they either act stupid or won’t answer:

Cal State Can’t Explain Why It Needs So Many Bureaucrats.

The California State University system has increased its hiring of managers at a steeper rate than its hiring of other employees over the past 10 years, according to a new state audit…in a report on the audit released on Thursday, the state auditor, Elaine M. Howle, wrote that the system could not sufficiently explain why it needed all the new managers, including deans, head coaches, and vice presidents, among other positions.

…The audit also found that the system’s 23 campuses did not have policies for periodically comparing their spending levels or reviewing their budget limits.

The Question: 

Read more