Democrats have long been the party of death, so the more recent obsession with assassination and the increasingly public use of violent rhetoric isn’t surprising. The progressive project is always paved with blood. It is in the mortar they use to build their edifice. They don’t teach this truth, and project it upon anyone who dares speak it.
It is not surprising to anyone paying attention because the media they choose often ignores it, hides it, helps the left paint their opponents with it, or they have found some safe solace in a self-imposed ignorance. Sadly, the project will not ignore them, and it is getting increasingly more difficult to ignore the party of death.
School teachers celebrating the execution of Charlie Kirk. The cult of personality that grew up around Luigi Mangione, whose fan club, even after he pleaded guilty, insists that what he did was justified. And now Lindsey Clancy.
Clancy lost her mind, strangled her three children to death, slit her wrists, jumped out of a second-story window, and survived, only to bask in the glow of feminist adoration as she sits on trial for multiple murders.
Sure, some insist her husband did it because, well, he’s a man, which is a heck of a thing for someone who can’t define what a woman is to say. But at the end of the day, isn’t this just a choice argument? She aborted her children at 17, 45, and 69 months, give or take. It is the law that’s wrong.
Are there any actual moms supporting what this woman did, or are they just in denial about it? How does a group of women, only recently painted broadly with a condition labeled suicidal empathy, find more compassion for alien rapists and murderers than Clancy’s victims?
Women, liberal women in particular, especially those without kids or husbandless empty nesters, are said to have a need to direct their natural empathy at a purpose or cause. Disregarding how bigoted it would be to suggest such a thing (unless you assume that men pretending to be women can pretend to have it too), why doesn’t that extend to Clancy’s kids or, for that matter, the children trafficked and raped by serial alien offenders?
The simple answer is that the left’s march through the institutions, its systemic need to break down and destroy everything in a culture before it can be replaced with the Marxist fantasy, is that they broke women.
Not all of them, but the rise of the AWFL and the growing bloodlust within this demographic suggest it’s true.
We are also faced with the gender dysphoria of gender dysphoria, a psychological affirmation that anyone who doesn’t attend your princess party wants you dead, therefore justifying any violence against anyone who doesn’t use your pronouns. That is also a choice, but as this is the left, you’ll see quite clearly see that it is just another bloody choice against people who are more likely to oppose the political designs of the Democratic Party and their new best friends in the DSA.
There is no compassion in making your supporters miserable assassins for your cause, but that is what the Democratic Party has done, and blood is coming. The question is whether the DSA turns the worst of them against the Democrats who made them (to secure their control of that party) before they set them loose on everyone else.
We’re in a world where murder is justifiable homicide, or not homicide at all, if it’s someone who thought the wrong things. That sort of compassion always leads to the chaos in which totalitarian regimes rise. No bail. No prisons. No police. Democrats refusing to enforce laws and judges letting criminals walk free. It’s the progressive plan in motion, and the democrats were doing it long before the DSA started running candidates in Democratic primaries on it.
I don’t always warn my readers that this sort of violence might be inevitable, but when I do, I remind them to buy ammo. Stay frosty, my friends.
