It's Not Vote Suppression If They Can Vote Absentee Where They Actually Live. - Granite Grok

It’s Not Vote Suppression If They Can Vote Absentee Where They Actually Live.

So tell me again - vote stealing activists use NH Democrat Martha Fuller Clarks house to vote fromYesterday, while speaking with Ed Naile on GrokTALK!, I brought up the Democrats claims that we are suppressing votes.  That objecting to out-of-state Democrat operatives or out-of-state-rate-tuition-paying college students voting in New Hampshire is a form of vote suppression.   These are people with multiple “domiciles,” a duplicitous “presence,” in multiple states.  (Many of them are paying out-of-state tuition because they do not meet the UNH definition of a New Hampshire resident.)

Most of the operatives leave one campaign to come here for a few days or a few weeks (or just on election day) before heading to the next campaign.   Some may never set foot in the state at all and they are frequently registered to vote simultaneously in more than one state.  So they can vote absentee from any of these “residences,” regardless of where they may physically be, but if we don’t let them vote absentee in New Hampshire, from wherever they are, this is sold as voter suppression?

Alexandra Isabel Perez-Caballero, for example, is registered to vote in South Carolina, but double registered to vote in New Hampshire just before the election in 2012, (from the exact same Manchester address as Joe Biden’s niece, Alana).  Alexandra works in SC, but through OFA, ‘lived’ here for a little over a month, voting absentee.

Wherever she physically was, she could have voted absentee in South Carolina, where she livs and works, but NH Democrats convinced her to steal your vote instead.

To contrast this act of fraud, consider that Daniel Kalik.  Kalik is an Arlington VA boy now, who grew up in New Hampshire, but works in Washington DC for J Street.  He and two other Kalik’s (presumably parents) are registered to vote from the same home from with Alan Biden and Alexandra Isabel Perez-Caballero were double registered to vote in November 2012.  Daniel voted absentee using the Manchester Address in NH in 2012, probably from Virginia, though he has worked in Vermont (for Howard Dean), and is a member of the Massachusetts bar.

We might wonder why he didn’t vote in Massachusetts, Virginia, or even Vermont in 2012?  He did not vote in New Hampshire in 2010, so we know he has it in him, and is, at the very least, dual registered in two or more states.  Did he vote absentee in that other state from New Hampshire?  Given that all his other votes were counted here, why can’t we just presume this to be true?

It may be that he voted absentee from Virginia/DC as a “resident” of Massachusetts in 2010, as he likely did for New Hampshire in 2012.  He could just as easily have voted in Virginia had he felt the need.

So Daniel, Alexandra, Alana, and the dozens of others we have uncovered, many of whom voted absentee in our state, all have a voting “right” that you and I do not.  They can steal a vote anywhere they choose, regardless of where they actually live, exercising the option to vote absentee, anywhere their name still resides on a checklist (or in person if they happen to be here and someone decides their vote is needed here, before going back home.)

When they do this they are choosing your representatives, advancing policy, and spending your tax dollars, without ever having to participate in whatever that voting decision brings.

They are not having their voting rights suppressed; they are actually suppressing your vote.  They are erasing your vote and your voice.  And there are hundreds, if not thousands of them, trolling into New Hampshire, to vote for Democrats, every election, helped, encouraged, and harbored by Democrats, elected officials, members of the AG’s office, and high ranking New Hampshire Democrat party officials.

Daniel Kalik’s not voting in Massachusetts, or Virginia (or wherever he voted in 2010) was not an act of vote suppression.  Alexandra’s not voting in South Carolina was not an act of vote suppression.  Alysha Tierney not voting in Massachusetts was not an act of vote suppression. Bryan Gregory Griffith into voting in New Hampshire in 2010 was not an act of vote suppression.

All these people, and this is just a sample, have jobs and homes and lives outside our state; places where they claim to live and vote.   Asking them not to vote absentee in New Hampshire, is not vote suppression.  Asking the thousands of college kids who fail to meet the residency requirements of UNH for in-state tuition, to vote absentee back home instead of here,  is not vote suppression.

New Hampshire Democrats telling them it is OK to vote here and shouting down anyone who objects IS VOTE SUPPRESSION!

Alexandra Isabel Perez-Caballero did not live here and should have voted absentee or in person in South Carolina.  Bryan Gregory-Griffith should have voted absentee in Arkansas, not absentee from Martha Fuller Clark’s home (and don’t Forget other folks who know how to vote where they live like Ellen Rose Whelan-Wuest or Ryan Fitzpatric Flynn)Alysha Tierney should have voted Absentee from Ludlow, or just voted in person there, and not from the home of a Nashua Democrat.  Those thousands of collge students who are forced to pay out of state tuition, should not be voting in New Hampshire.

When we are done, we may have hundreds, if not thousands of examples of this.  People who could have voted where they live–outside the state, but were encouraged to vote in New Hampshire by Democrats.  People who will never pay a dime, or have to waste their time, dealing with the short term will or long term consequences of an illegitmate governor, state legislature, or any other official who came to power as a result of New Hampshire Democrats using others to steal the voice and votes of actual residents.

Democrats are suppressing your vote.  They’ve been doing it for years.  And 2012 may have been the single biggest coordinated act of fraud in state history.  Almost 99,000 same day registrations, 14,000 of which cast votes with no identification of any kind, many of whom cannot be located afterward.  And most of those are on top of the fraud we’ve been exposing along with Ed Naile and Rich Girard.

If the Democrats continue to get away with it, you will never know if the people elected, the measures passed or failed, any act resulting from a public vote, is the will of the residents of that political body or the result of Democrats abusing the system to have their way with you wallet and your rights.

Until we have clean voter checklists, clean votes, and know that the people casting them have demonstrated residency at least as strict as that used by the greedy liberal hypcrites running the state University System, you are being robbed.  Democrats are suppressing your vote.

>