We are often privvy to things around here we are not encouraged to share right away. Here’s one that just popped up on WMUR.
State Sen. Martha Fuller Clark, D-District 21, has eight people registered to vote under her single-family address in Portsmouth. Several of them came to New Hampshire to work on campaigns for various periods of time and voted in elections before moving on.
When asked about the legitimacy of their domicile status, Clark said:
“By and large, the young people who stayed with me were committed to New Hampshire, but given their age, whether they intended to stay is impossible to predict.”
Talk about a total BS answer. State Senator Clark was housing professional campaign workers who do not live here but voted here. Who very likely voted for her and every other Democrat up and down that ticket. Then they left because that is why they came. To vote for Democrats.
We had this under control but a ruling by Judge Lewis, Democrat, punched a big enough hole in the domicile law to allow it….weeks before the big election. Holes that had been put there by Democrats from 2007 to 2010 which the Republicans finally managed to plug, briefly. But Judge Lewis unplugged them, on schedule, at the request of the political left wing activist group called the League of Women Voters. He just signed off on their request and BAM! Anyone from anywhere could come here and vote. They just had to claim they were “committed” long enough to cast a ballot.
And that, to Democrats, is not vote stealing. It is not unethical, not immoral, it’s not even cheating to them.
As for the impossible to predict part…I predict people have “moved” into Martha Fuller Clark’s house for voting purposes before, and then moved back out right after. I also predict that she is not the only Democrat doing it. And I don’t just mean NH Democrat House Rep Cindy Rosenwald either.
Note- I changed the title of the post. Too long.
