Today’s Islamic Radicalism – True Believers

As we all try come to grips with the tragedy of the recent attacks on in Paris, we once again ask ourselves the logical question of what is going on here. Such attacks seem almost inexplicable, so removed are they from our own day to day experience. We struggle to make sense of these assaults and look for patterns to help us understand the nature of what we are seeing. Equally as perplexing is the utter disregard of the attackers for their own safety. Indeed, many seek out their own “martyrdom” and the promise of paradise.

Nor can we understand the appeal of ISIS which is drawing in thousands of young men from around the world and which is launching them forward with such zeal that more traditional armies are melting before them. Even severe American air strikes have yet to fully stop them.

Some say that such incidents are reflective of the nature of Islam. Others say that they are the clash of civilizations as the great sociologist Samuel Huntington called it. Yet neither of these answers are terribly satisfying. We know that, the vast majority of Muslims around the world are peaceful, pious individuals just trying to live their lives. By the same token, most of the casualties in the waves of attacks are themselves Muslims. Indeed, Muslims have born the brunt of the suffering in the violence of the last fifteen years.  But it is increasingly clear that all of these attacks are almost always being perpetrated by highly marginalized individuals young men like the Tsarnaev brothers in Boston or the Kouachi brothers in Paris. Yes, militant Islam is a common pattern. But one senses that there is something deeper at work here.

Read more

It is (again!) time to get serious about energy

With gasoline prices rapidly climbing back to the $4.00 a gallon level, it is time to once again plead with our representatives in Washington to show the much needed leadership on the issue of energy policy. In the just completed election cycle, there was far too little attention paid to this critical economic and national security issue. As recent events have shown, we have left our economy hostage to the old boom bust cycle of the petroleum markets. At the same time, we have allowed ourselves to become hyper dependent on events in the Middle East and a number of other (usually highly unstable) underdeveloped countries around the world.

The cost and the risks of finding new oil are going up every day. We had a very dramatic display of this last year with the Deepwater Horizon Well in the Gulf of Mexico. That well, which caused at least $20 billion worth if damage, was in waters “only” one mile deep. Other rigs are currently drilling “ultra-deep water” wells that go several miles down. We are clearly having to take bigger and bigger risks to get to additional reserves and those risks will surely come back to haunt us, just as we are seeing today. It seems we have already forgotten the lessons of that terrible experience.

It is not that we do not have other options – we certainly…

Read more

What’s wrong with this picture?

China has now overtaken Japan as the world’s second largest economic power.  The news came with the inevitability we have come to expect, given their record of 10% annual growth. This rise from poverty has never been equaled in world history. Two hundred years from now, historians will remember this as the most important event of our times.

At almost the same moment came the news that Germany’s economy is charging ahead, growing faster than any other European economy. It is being powered forth by the reforms they have undertaken in the last five years. Those reforms ditched the old European social welfare system in favor of smaller government, lower taxes, less regulation and more market freedom. Germany is no longer the sick man of Europe.

(Indeed, in recent days the Cuban government has announced that they will be laying off more than one million government workers while loosening restrictions on the private sector, and the Swedes have voted in a center right government with the same goals. The private sector has been asked to shoulder a greater role in the provision of education, health care and welfare services. The move to the right is also evident in Britain, Norway, Denmark and Finland.)  

And yet here in the United States, we are looking at the prospect of continued economic stagnation, fearful that we will continue to lose our manufacturing base while or infrastructure deteriorates, and less confident than we have ever been for our children’s future.

What’s wrong with this picture? Simply put,…

Read more

Washington’s New Financial’s Fig Leaf

A well functioning financial system is essential to the lives of customers, investors and businesses alike. We have just seen the dangers of a system that is broken and dysfunctional. A key part of that system is the regulatory framework which is supposed to oversee the smooth functioning of the financial markets. Clearly that has … Read more

LET’S LEARN FROM OUR NEIGHBORS

It is difficult to believe that even with the full support of the White House, the senior leadership of the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives, and legislative majorities in both chambers, the Democratic health care proposal still may fail. This monstrosity of a bill has become so unpopular that Democrats may seek to pass … Read more

AFGHANISTAN – THE LEAST WORST OPTION

Last night President Obama finally gave us his long awaited answer to the question of what we should do about Afghanistan. As a candidate for the U.S. Congress, I very reluctantly endorse his decision to add an additional 30,000 troops to that conflict.
 
However, serious questions remain to be answered about the decision making process leading up to this decision, the viability of this escalation, as well as the underlying strategy itself. Oddly, the President took a full three months to give us a slightly scaled down version of General McChrystal’s request. His delay has unfortunately brought into question both his resolve and his strength as a leader. It has also fed into the growing domestic and international view of timidity in this Administration.
 
In the end, what the President gave us was a strategy which merely buys another year and a half for Afghanistan to build up its forces and for us to exit somewhat gracefully. The odds are very high that neither will happen as planned. Since he merely stated that “after eighteen months our troops will begin to come home,” he has merely kicked the can down the road and bought us additional time.
 
What the President knows but did not say is that the real key to this equation is not Afghanistan but Pakistan. Pakistan is currently the most dangerous country in the world. It is now a highly unstable nuclear power that is rapidly coming apart at the seams. The nightmare scenario is that Pakistan collapses and nuclear weapons get into the hands of Al Qaeda and/or the Taliban.
 
Chaos is Afghanistan would further destabilize Pakistan. Our presence will help keep Afghanistan together and serves to provide at least a partial buffer against insurgent incursions across Pakistan’s border. It is also prudent for us to be close by in case the situation in Pakistan collapses.
 
Fortunately, the President quickly took off the table a precipitous withdrawal from Afghanistan as many Democrats have urged. Such a measure would have lead to a major power vacuum in the country and another protracted civil war. Al Qaeda would have been handed a huge political and psychological victory both in Afghanistan and around the world.
 
Still, the newly announced strategy carries with it numerous inherent problems and contradictions. Some of the open issues include:

Read more

Carol’s Confession

Now that the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), more popularly known as the “Stimulus Bill,” is six months old, we can begin to assess what results have been achieved by playing another $787 billion on the United States’ credit card. The answer appears to be little to nothing. Unemployment is officially up to 10.2% … Read more

The Importance of Primaries

The results of election night 2009 are a cause for great celebration for both the Republican Party and more importantly the cause of limited government conservatism. At the same time, the night’s most significant blemish, the loss of Doug Hoffman in the 23rd congressional district of New York, demonstrates an important fact. Primaries matter.   … Read more

Do as I say, not as I do, Part 2 – Carol Shea-Porter’s motto

In the 2008 campaign, Carol Shea Porter repeatedly blasted Jeb Bradley on all sorts of odd issues. Last week I wrote a short piece on the how she repeatedly made a big point of complaining about Jeb Bradley’s timing on returning campaign contributions from a colleague who was being investigated for ethical problems. But, as it … Read more

Do as I say, not as I do – Carol Shea-Porter’s motto

In the 2008 elections, Carol Shea Porter made a major point of repeatedly criticizing Jeb Bradley for taking a $15,000 campaign contribution from a Congressional colleague who was then under investigation. She said over and over again that Jeb Bradley should not wait until there was a “conviction”, charging a cover-up. She admonished Jeb to … Read more

Here they go again!

The big national debate is now, of course, focused on the attempts of the Obama administration and the Democratic Congress to dramatically deepen the government’s role in the health care system. But off in the wings is an effort to takeover another private market function – the market for student loans. Sadly, such a takeover … Read more

HEALING OUR HEALTH CARE SYSTEM

The focus of the national agenda this summer has clearly become reforming America’s health care system. Bring it on! There is no question that our health care system needs to be reformed to squeeze out the much inflated expenses and to assure high quality care. The American healthcare system is the most expensive in the world. And it is clear that, by any statistical measure, we are not getting value for money. Not only do these costs put proper health care out of reach for many middle class Americans, but these inflated costs are also making our products uncompetitive in the world economy, adding to our other economic problems.
 
Unfortunately however, in the proposals that have emerged, we seem to have taken our eye off the ball. The true challenge – the cost vs. quality issue – has become sidetracked. The debate has now become about health insurance, though this is only a part of the problem. Important as it is, insurance coverage is merely a way to pay for medical care. The focus should really be on the actual medical care delivery system, where the costs versus quality problems are to be found. To date, we have not touched those issues.  We are, in effect, putting the cart before the horse. And if the acrimony over insurance is any guide, the storm from that debate will be even more ferocious than today’s.
 
Since the discussion is now centered of insurance, it is worthwhile considering the merit of the existing proposal otherwise knows as HR 3200 Two questions in particular seem to be the most contentious: 1) will such a system lower patient’s medical costs 2) how would the public option impact the existing medical insurance system.  We would, of course, a ll like to see the 47 million currently uninsur ed people have access to quality health care, especially in catastrophic situations. But the stark reality is that suddenly adding such a large block of people in a total spectrum plan will cause a sharp spike in medical costs. It is a simple supply and demand calculation. Add to this the $1 trillion price tag and you get a big new shock to the system – at a time when the system can least absorb it. We should first streamline the system before we add a major new load onto it.
 
But the bigger issue is…

Read more

An open Letter to Congresswoman Carol Shea-Porter

ROBERT M. BESTANI Congresswoman Carol Shea Porter1330 Longworth HOBWashington, DC 20515 July 24, 2009 Dear Congresswoman Shea Porter: At a time when our economy is in crisis and both families and businesses around the country are struggling to keep their expenses to a minimum, we should expect nothing less from our government. Clearly, government draws … Read more

You’ve Got To Be Kidding Me!

Our Congresswoman, Carol Shea Porter proudly reported today that she had secured all of $1.5 million to fund two local New Hampshire projects.  One million of this was for streetscape improvements in the Gaslight District in Manchester and $500,000 for infrastructure improvements for the Berwick Bridge in Somersworth. Great, thank you! In the meantime, the … Read more

PUBLIC HEALTH CARE COMPETITION?

In medicine, the primary rule that is the Hippocratic Oath is “First Do No Harm”. The new healthcare public sector initiative that Congress is proposing violates openly this standard.

As the health care reform debate rages in Congress, the establishment of a new publicly funded medical insurance provider now seems to be on center stage. With their monopoly on power in Washington, the Democrats are fully intent on creating yet another new government agency to handle this function. This is hardly shocking; the Democrats have always represented growth in government.

But what is interesting and new is the argument being used that the creation of such entity will keep the private sector competitive and on its toes. This novel idea represents a first. Where, one is tempted to ask, has the public sector ever provided honest competition to the private sector?

The fact of the matter is that it is always the other way around. Governments around the world are trying to privatize state owned entities to make them more competitive and self sustaining. Proponents of privatization have always pointed out that state owned enterprises are usually slow, inefficient and consistently devoid of innovation. Not even the opponents of privatization have ever claimed that state owned enterprises are more efficient and competitive.

One is hard pressed to think of a single instance where a government enterprise has out performed the private sector. Certainly this was not the case with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, Amtrak, TVA, the Export-Import Bank, etc.

The public sector has rarely, if ever…

Read more

Washington’s financial figleaf

WASHINGTON’S FINANCIAL FIG LEAF

So, Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner and the Obama Administration have now made a proposal for financial regulatory reform. Clearly, such a proposal was very much needed. But the proposal that the U.S. Treasury has now presented is sorely off target. It is neither comprehensive enough, nor does it address the core problems that everyone on Wall Street knows exist. It merely tinkers on the margins.

Until the fundamental problems are addressed, all we have been given is a fig leaf. This is dangerous as it has the potential of lulling us into a false sense of complacency. We have been here before with smaller crisis (such as with the Long Term Capital fiasco) and nothing was learned. Let’s not repeat our mistakes.

One of the principal reasons for the current financial crisis was the gross failure of the existing regulatory institutions. President Obama himself openly acknowledged this when he announced his reform package. Regulatory reform has been very much needed for a long time and very little has been done to fix the problems that plague our financial institutions.

The Geithner plan calls for a massive expansion of the powers of the Federal Reserve. Without a doubt, of the financial regulators that are examining the banks, the Federal Reserve is the most sophisticated. But, this is off a very low base. The Fed’s regulators are too young, inexperienced, under compensated and hardly the best we can get in the financial markets.

Nor is it clear…

Read more

Let’s import jobs into New Hampshire

LET’S IMPORT JOBS INTO NEW HAMPSHIRE

In a time of high unemployment, why isn’t NH doing more to promote job creation?

Despite all of our problems, America remains the most attractive market in the world for almost every product imaginable. In large part, this is why most American businesses don’t immediately think of exporting their products abroad – a major failing of ours. But foreign companies are well aware of the opportunities that exist in the U.S. markets. Anyone doubting this should immediately look at the auto industry. The U.S. still produces some of the best cars in the world. But, we do so primarily in the south, in such states as South Carolina, Kentucky, and Alabama and they bear the brand logos of BMW, Toyota, Honda, Infinity, etc.

And it is not just cars; Honda Aviation, for example, recently opened a new plant in North Carolina which will help offset that state’s loss of its old textile mills. Nor is it just manufacturing; the list of businesses is almost limitless, and includes high tech companies, software companies, call centers, etc. Indeed, without such businesses, American consumers would immediately encounter a steep bout of inflation and unemployment.

So here is the question: when Kia Motors or Hyundai were recently looking to open new assembly plants, why is it that no one tried to persuade them to build a plant in NH? With New Hampshire’s great lifestyle, low taxes, our high tech base and our business environment, our state should be an excellent destination for all kinds of business operations. More often than not, foreign businesses are looking to establish operations where the enabling business environment is considerably better than in their home countries. This usually means the U.S.A. It should also mean New Hampshire.

With New Hampshire’s economy softening, 

Read more

Welcome to “North Massachusetts”

North Massachusetts

In today’s economic environment, helping small businesses create new jobs needs to be our leading priority. Yes, we must take care of the displaced, but we must do it through job creation. The Democrats in Concord can’t seem to understand this.  They keep adding more and more weight onto the state’s business community, expecting them to continue to fly. They have just done it again this week by adding more social safety net legislation at the expense of job creation. While they will now crow about “helping people” their policies will have the exact opposite impact.

America’s economic safety net undoubtedly plays an important role in stabilizing the economy when events or economic situations take a turn for the worse. Markets have always had an unfortunate tendency to over-react in the short run. Therefore, such measures as unemployment insurance serve as a good short term shock absorber to slow the descent while economic policies and normal market forces bring the economy back into balance. Other social safety net policies can also be helpful to an economy and the quality of life.

But as the saying goes, “Taken to an extreme, any virtue can be turned into a vice.” Just as a wrong sized shock absorber on a car can be counter productive, so it is in economics. The Europeans have been seeing this in spades over the last few decades. Several countries like France and Germany have adopted such inflated unemployment and other social benefits that businesses are now very reluctant to hire new people. As a result, unemployment is the overriding problem because existing businesses can’t bear the load. This also means that new businesses are hard to start and job creating innovation is much slower than in the faster paced economies. There is clearly a balance to be struck.

America’s business community is now struggling to survive in the worst economic downturn in the past seventy years. Even the largest and once most successful of businesses are holding on by their fingernails. In the past year we have seen the bankruptcy of some of America’s business icons such as Chrysler and General Motors, Merrill Lynch, Circuit City, and many others. At the same time businesses have been scaling back and closing stores at an alarming pace. As a result, the country’s jobless rate jumped to 9.4 percent in May, the highest in twenty-five years. This figure is already higher than the “worse case scenario” of the government’s just completed stress tests. And there is more to come as unemployment will surely pass into the double digits.

 

Read more

A commentary on “No government, no markets”

  "I can’t resist: without government, there would be no f*****g MARKET. What is it about contracts you don’t understand?"   -Michael Kitch   Skip asked me to comment on this ("Is Government NECESSARY for a marketplace to exist?"), as he knows that I am an economist. This is a very good but very complex question. … Read more

Share to...