SIMS: America’s Weaponized Racial Divide

Exposing Political Lies, Media Distortions, and the Weaponization of Race

The recent controversy surrounding Charlie Kirk, falsely accused of making racist remarks about Black women, reveals a deeper truth about how race and politics are weaponized in America today. Contrary to viral claims, Kirk never generalized Black women. Instead, he critiqued four prominent figures—Joy Reid, Michelle Obama, Sheila Jackson Lee, and Ketanji Brown Jackson—as beneficiaries of affirmative action policies. Yet, this nuance was discarded, replaced by a misleading narrative crafted to silence conservative voices under the guise of combating racism.

This incident is symptomatic of a broader and more worrying trend: the sustained racial division perpetuated by former President Barack Obama and senior Democrats, including Hillary Clinton. These political figures and their allies have not only sustained but intensified racial animosity for political gain—using race as a wedge to fracture the American electorate.

Debunking the Racism Claim Against Charlie Kirk

An illuminating video by commentator Ty Smith (Modern Renaissance Man) meticulously debunks the claim that Charlie Kirk declared all Black women intellectually inferior. Kirk explicitly referenced only four women who themselves publicly credited affirmative action for their achievements. His argument centered on meritocracy and accountability, not race or misogyny.

The distortion of Kirk’s remarks epitomizes a dangerous media and political tactic: taking statements out of context to fuel outrage. This weaponization of “racism” claims not only misleads the public but also degrades sincere political dialogue, turning disagreements into moral indictments.

Obama’s Racial Division Strategy

Barack Obama’s presidency marked a pivot from a unifying campaign to governance and post-presidency steeped in identity politics and racial grievance. His 2011 Executive Order 13583 to institutionalize diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies set the course for embedding race-conscious practices throughout the federal government and beyond.

During Obama’s second term, mainstream media ramped up usage of racially charged terms like “systemic racism,” “white privilege,” and “white supremacy” by as much as 700% to 1000%, normalizing a rhetoric that often conflates legitimate critique of systemic issues with generalized racial hostility.

In September 2025, Obama’s public event where he directly or indirectly labeled Charlie Kirk a racist reiterated his ongoing pattern of using race as a political weapon. This behavior echoes his time in office and shows he has not changed his divisive approach.

Hillary Clinton’s Recent Divisive Rhetoric

Following closely, Hillary Clinton’s remarks on MSNBC’s Morning Joe in 2025 stirringly blamed “white men of a certain religion” for undermining the country. Her claim that efforts to restore a “world dominated by white men of a certain persuasion” are “destroying this country,” targets broad demographics by race, religion, and gender. Such divisive rhetoric echoes radical identity politics that damage social cohesion and demonize entire communities.

The Political and Social Impact

Together, these events reveal a coordinated strategy among Democrats’ radical left wing to:

• Label political opponents as racists regardless of context or truth.
• Institutionalize race and identity as the overriding frame for policy and discourse.
• Demonize broad demographic groups to secure political power through division.

This strategy accelerates social fragmentation, replacing merit and individual character with group identity and grievance. As Greg Salsbury describes, America’s political divide is no longer a mere disagreement over policy but a fundamental cultural conflict: Democrats driving the nation toward chaos while Republicans seek stability.

A Call for Truth and Unity

The lies about Charlie Kirk and the inflammatory rhetoric from Obama and Clinton must be confronted head-on for the sake of America’s future. Citizens deserve honest debate free from distortion and slander. Our nation’s cohesion depends on rejecting the weaponization of race and demanding that leaders promote unity rooted in shared values rather than division.

Only by exposing these destructive tactics can we reclaim a political culture that celebrates merit, character, and national pride over tribal grievance. The alternative is a nation perpetually divided, driving a bus over a cliff, led by those who profit most from chaos.

This Op-Ed aims to educate readers about the reality behind the Kirk controversy, the ongoing impact of Obama and Clinton’s rhetoric, and the urgent need to reject the left’s destructive identity politics.

Authors’ opinions are their own and may not represent those of Grok Media, LLC, GraniteGrok.com, its sponsors, readers, authors, or advertisers.

Got Something to Say, We Want to Hear It. Comment or submit Op-Eds to steve@granitegrok.com