An alleged whistleblower inside ABC News is said to have signed an affidavit attesting to the truth of their claims that ABC colluded with Kamal Harriss before her Presidential Debate with Donald Trump.
The affidavit states how the Harris campaign was given sample question which were essentially the same questions that were given during the debate and separate assurances of fact checking Donald Trump and that she would NOT be fact checked. Accordingly, the affidavit states several other factors that were built into the debate to give Kamala a significant advantage.
This is easily one of the juiciest bit of confirmation basis to come along in recent weeks. Everything wrong with the media and politics, as viewed from the right, is summed up in the supposition. And I’m not saying it is not possible or even unlikely. From bussed-in supporters to planted questions to fake crowds, the Dems will say and do anything to win. But if it looks like bait and smells like bait.
I’ll believe it when I see it.
I have seen and read the affidavit and after the attorney blacks out the name of the whistleblower and other information that could dox the whistleblower, I will release the full affidavit. I will be releasing the affidavit before the weekend is out.
This delay excuse is at least plausible, though I’m not sure why the recipient of the whistleblower statement can’t black out the name(s) themselves if they’ve “seen” the thing. Did they see it with the name? If so, there’s no reason not to do that yourself. If you didn’t see it, then it’s blacked out or not there.
I am suitably suspicious. You should be too.
