The international federation that manages elite competitions in water sports told Lia’ William’ Thomas he couldn’t compete with the gals in the pool. Thomas appealed on the grounds that women can have a penis (I’m paraphrasing). World Aquatics said, Sorry, Billy, you’ve still got a willy and all the sporty benefits that come with it.
These are natural, biological advantages that you can’t escape. Therefore, it would be unfair to women athletes (also still paraphrasing).
Great news! Lia Thomas won’t be able to compete in women’s category at the Olympics or any other elite competition.
He has just lost his legal battle in Court of Arbitration for Sport ruling.
This is a victory for women and girls everywherehttps://t.co/fEZc47K0FA
— Riley Gaines (@Riley_Gaines_) June 12, 2024
World Aquatics rule is no “women” who transitioned after the age of twelve. William was a ranked Men’s Swimmer before he “switched teams” to rise to…number one. If that sounds fair to anyone, you either hate women or are suffering from an undiagnosed case of mental illness.
Interestingly enough, the majority of mentally ill Willy Thomas supporters are also self-proclaimed defenders of women’s rights (as you already know). And while it is a victory for women when a global regulatory body arrives at what appears to be the only sensible conclusion, remember that the Democrat party has yet to pay any price. World Aquatics is (also) still open to “women” who were born male if they started their life-long course of dangerous hormone therapies as a child.
I have to wonder: could World Aquatics be playing a bit of tri-level chess? Assuming the child survives the transition drugs, the potential loss of bone density and other common medical complications will likely make them incapable of participating in aquatic sports at any level, let alone elite.
More Bad News for Willy and the Gang
I say, I Say, a judge in Texas, a Federal Judge, that is, has ruled that the Bidenista’s rewriting of the Title IX rules is unlawful.
This case involves an immensely difficult policy issue: balancing the protection of personal privacy and rights in school classrooms, bathrooms, locker rooms, and other intimate facilities while, at the same time, ensuring that no student is marginalized in an educational setting. But the resolution of this difficult policy issue is not for the Court to decide. Instead, the Constitution assigns such major policy choices to the appropriate elected officials, who must follow the proper legal procedures to initiate any desired change. Defendants failed to follow the proper procedures here. Rather than promote the equal opportunity, dignity, and respect that Title IX demands for both biological sexes, Defendants’ Guidance Documents do the opposite in an effort to advance an agenda wholly divorced from the text, structure, and contemporary context of Title IX.
In other words, “Title IX pertains exclusively to biological sex, with no references to “gender identity,” “gender expression,” or any other weird concept radical left-wing gender ideology creates out of thin air.”
Sporty lesbians (without a willy) should be excited on both accounts, but we should expect the usual pushback. Dems are nothing if not persistent, but there is some evidence of sea-change in opinion, more rightly defined as “people have stopped putting up with this bullsh!t” and are standing up for girls and women. It’s good to see, but if you’d like that to mean more, get more traction, and result in more meaningful results, you’ll need to step up at the ballot box.
Find and remove the gender-bend from office. Please do it for the children.
As for (I’ve Still Gotta) Willy Thomas, he can still compete for a spot on an Olympic Team—the Men’s team.
I wish you the best of luck, William.
