How About a Prescription from Your Doctor … To Buy Lettuce?

by
Steve MacDonald

The internet loves stories about globalist plots to use everything and anything to get mRNA anything into the general population. There are stories about jabbed livestock and even vegetables, but the State of Tennessee is pushing back.

HB1894 seeks to regulate “food that contains a vaccine or vaccine material,” and if you intend to produce it, consumers won’t be able to buy it… without a prescription.

“You would have to get a prescription for that to make sure that we know how much of the lettuce you have to eat based off of your body type so we don’t under-vaccinate you, which leads to the possibility of the efficacy of the drug being compromised, or we overdose you based off how much lettuce is [eaten],” he said during a House committee meeting in February. “All this does is [say] we’re going to classify these types of food sources as pharmaceuticals, so if you want to consume them you would go to your doctor and get a prescription.”

I’m not sure that’s the biggest issue. Even if you can get vaccines into food and neither cooking nor prep compromises or alters the drug or its delivery (or maybe it does), how do you control dosing? The dose makes the poison. Some might not be enough. What is enough, and what happens if they get too much? You have to control more than what happens to the vegetable, in this case, lettuce (and don’t feed any to your rabbits).

The regulatory logistics would be extensive and expensive for both compliance and enforcement, and neither would be adequate for the task, even if safety were a genuine concern and they weren’t just looking for another way to make people sick.

And what about drug interactions? Does your grocer need to be a certified pharmacist who reviews your cart full of purchases for unsafe interactions (scans your chip for an updated list of whatever you are taking) to ensure it won’t “produce” unpleasant side effects, including death?

It’s such a bad idea that they should stop wasting our money on it, but states like Tennessee, which is looking down the road, feel obligated to craft laws to protect their citizens should this recklessness reach warp speed.

The chatter suggests that there are multiple programs being funded to look at food as a delivery system; this is just one, and the experts are not admitting to any sort of success. In fact, the preferred narrative seems to be that even if they were to succeed, it would make the food cost prohibitive, so there’s no need for the legislation. That’s probably true, but gain of function research is illegal in the US, so they farm it out to China, Ukraine, and dozens of other countries. Why wouldn’t they do the same thing for lettuce (or whatever), subsidize it to get the cost down, and then quietly infect millions of people with whatever it is they grew inside it?

…Very quietly until someone like Michael Schellenberger exposed it on X to the chorus of denials from the FDA.

Author

  • Steve MacDonald

    Steve is a long-time New Hampshire resident, blogger, and a member of the Board of directors of The 603 Alliance. He is the owner of Grok Media LLC and the Managing Editor of GraniteGrok.com, a former board member of the Republican Liberty Caucus of New Hampshire, and a past contributor to the Franklin Center for Public Policy.

Share to...