Weird fibrous blood clots were the third vaccine side effect conspiracy to be shouted down by the choir boys for the Public Health Industrial Complex. The first was mental, and the second was sudden cardiac arrest (athletes were dropping dead all over the world). Clots, however, were elevated to a nickname—The Clot Shot.
Any number of documentaries are available, as is expert testimony by pathologists and funeral directors as to the sudden proliferation of long-stretch clots in the veins and arteries of the COVID-Era recently deceased. I don’t need to link or enumerate; you know what I mean and where to find it, as with the pushback that it was caused by COVID (almost everyone did die from that for a while).
Allegedly vaccine-injured litigants in the UK took AstraZeneca to court where,
[I]n the legal document submitted to the High Court in February, AstraZeneca said: “It is admitted that the AZ vaccine can, in very rare cases, cause TTS. The causal mechanism is not known.
“Further, TTS can also occur in the absence of the AZ vaccine (or any vaccine). Causation in any individual case will be a matter for expert evidence.”
Lawyers argue that the AstraZeneca-Oxford vaccine is “defective” and that its efficacy has been “vastly overstated” – claims AstraZeneca strongly denies.
Scientists first identified a link between the vaccine and a new illness called vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (VITT) as early as March 2021, shortly after the Covid-19 vaccine rollout began.
Lots of things cause clots, including TTS, which can cause clots. Therefore, any increase in clots may not be a result of patients who received the AstraZeneca COVID vaccine, which might cause TTS, which might cause clots.
AstraZeneca’s vaccine is an actual vaccine constructed using a genetically modified adenovirus. It is not mRNA, which continues to be experimental (if you get it, you are the experiment).
The vast number of side effects, including looking like an ass repeating the 95% safe and effective marketing, appear connected to the mRNA for which we have yet to see any meaningful lawsuits unless you mean Moderna suing Pfizer (and BioNTech) over patent violations or GlaxoSmithKline suing Pfizer and BioNTech for “infringing GSK patents related to messenger RNA.”
There are suits in the US, but mostly over things tangential to the mRNA vaccine, like how the Feds manage taxpayer-backed mRNA vaccine injury compensation. Everyone had immunity when it came to the juice, which isn’t necessarily impenetrable. It seems to me that it can only be defended if accurate and complete details were provided so that anyone could realistically give informed consent. We know that didn’t happen.
Texas is suing Pfizer over “misleading acts and practices by making unsupported claims,” which is easy enough to prove a hat-trick of years later when many of the people who cashed in and bailed out have admitted the edges were squidgy.
The only real Financial victory (and it’s a bit hollow) is the tumbling share of Pfizer stock. It peaked at $58.50 during the mandate madness but has since collapsed to 25.73. For reference, prior to COVID, it languished in the low thirties, so 26 bucks is not the disaster, some claim. But it’s something. And not enough. The vaccine injured were tricked and pressured and then harmed.
Someone needs to pay for that and it shouldn’t be taxpayers.
