The World Professional Association for Transgender Health is a go-to resource for everyone promoting the gender surgery laundromat. They provide excuses for neutering kids and ruining their lives, giving them cancer or causing premature death. They don’t admit those risks in public, but they do discuss them in private.
Leaked internal communications show doctors who offer so-called “gender-affirming care” know that transgender hormones cause serious diseases, including cancer. ..
The “WPATH FILES” include emails and messages from an internal discussion forum by doctors, as well as statements from a video call of WPATH members. The files reveal that the doctors working for WPATH know that so-called “gender-affirming care” can cause severe mental and physical disease and that it is impossible for minors to give “informed consent” to it.
You can read Michael Shellenberger’s tweet here, but the gist is that “do no harm,” as we’ve all suspected—especially since COVID—shall not interfere with bloated bottom-line benefits, including those generated by certain elective surgeries—treatments and interventions whose consequences the “patient” is admittedly incapable of understanding.
Speaking of transitions, and I’ve mentioned this in the past, hop in the Wayback machine and jump to 2009. What were some of the chest-pounding progressive exhortations for justifying a massive public intervention in private medicine? Unnecessary tests, drugs, or procedures that drive up the cost of health care.
Democrats are not just the party defending that, on children, without fully informed consent and in the absence of the ability to give it. They bully anyone who dares to question the validity of the science (hard or soft), even though we know that 80-90% of kids who express any level of gender dysphoria will end up happy and alive, living without gender drugs or surgery.
We also know that transition does not improve mental health, likely makes it worse, and has no effect on suicidal ideation unless, by that, you mean it increases.
Given these admissions by the go-to experts on the topic, the only reason for chemical or surgical intervention (as opposed to care, concern, and perhaps therapy) is to make money.
Is it safe to assume that some of that money ends up in Democrat Campaign coffers?
