Have I said it too often? You guys are awesome. The engagement is top-shelf and growing steadily, and the comments themselves, with rare exceptions, are relevant and add to the debate. This, of course, makes my job more difficult.
My problem, not yours. I’m not whining. I’m excited and look forward to sending someone some swag every week. So what about this week?
JeffersonVoltaire engaged in a series of comments with Nhnative that struck me as informative and eye-opening, and NHnative was pleased with the results. I had to pick one, so I picked this one.
Was going to say; I Have to play devil’s advocate here… but, not really. More like I have to explain some very fundamental points of law that people seem to be determined to just pretend don’t exist, the difference between private and public. Apologies if that sounds pointed but I’ve been trying to get this across for years now. I continue to feel like I’m talking to the walls. And now I’m sounding like my father…The Supreme Court didn’t make any ruling on “free speech in New Hampshire”. They made a ruling, about trying to exercise your private free speech rights in somebody else’s private commercial organization.The “schools” and the boards that run them, are owned and part of a municipal corporation, being run as a private, for profit commercial entity dealing in private corporate paper (Federal Reserve Notes) as well as securities. They are not, by any definition a public governmental organization.If your kids are “registered” there, you know, like a membership… they & you are subject to their rules. No different than if you have a membership at the gym and you signed their membership contract and paid their fee, inside their building, you are subject to their rules, period. If you try to hold a political demonstration in the gym, they have the right to throw you out. You can’t bring your private rights into their sandbox. And as an adult, you really should know better.It says this very clearly in the beginning of court ruling. If you know how to read it.1) She was charged with Trespassing… You can not trespass in a building that belongs to the people.2) The action was a civil action – used when there is a contract at play as the governing rules.3) The “law” was held to be the RSA, private, corporate rules known as Administrative Law, operating in a jurisdiction foreign to the constitution, coming out of a De Facto “government” that is running because people refuse to learn basic law and pick up the reigns of the true De Jure government, that were dropped by fraud and deception over 100 years ago.
Congrats to this week’s winner. I will need you to email me your mailing address and a way to confirm you are JeffersonVoltaire – and I will then send you your ‘GrokSwag!
