This seems like medically dense material, but my layman’s tweak is that researchers found a new key to SARS CoV2, and IVM (Ivermectin) blocks it “when added to RBCs [red blood cells] prior to spike protein and reversed HA (hemagglutination) when added afterward.”
Related: We Know Why The Public Health Industrial Complex Had to Discredit Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin
Linked from Dr. Paul Elias Alexander’s Newsletter; From the International Journal of Molecular Sciences (reformatted).
Experimental findings for SARS-CoV-2 related to the glycan biochemistry of coronaviruses indicate that attachments from spike protein to glycoconjugates on the surfaces of red blood cells (RBCs), other blood cells and endothelial cells are key to the infectivity and morbidity of COVID-19. To provide further insight into these glycan attachments and their potential clinical relevance, the classic hemagglutination (HA) assay was applied using spike protein from the Wuhan, Alpha, Delta and Omicron B.1.1.529 lineages of SARS-CoV-2 mixed with human RBCs.
The electrostatic potential of the central region of spike protein from these four lineages was studied through molecular modeling simulations. Inhibition of spike protein-induced HA was tested using the macrocyclic lactone ivermectin (IVM), which is indicated to bind strongly to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein glycan sites. The results of these experiments were, first, that spike protein from these four lineages of SARS-CoV-2 induced HA. Omicron induced HA at a significantly lower threshold concentration of spike protein than the three prior lineages and was much more electropositive on its central spike protein region. IVM blocked HA when added to RBCs prior to spike protein and reversed HA when added afterward.
Researchers suggest – unless I’m reading this wrong, and please correct me if I am – that Ivermectin may (giddy laugh), help reverse mRNA vaccine side-effects.
They furthermore suggest therapeutic options using competitive glycan-binding agents such as IVM and may help elucidate rare serious adverse effects (AEs) associated with COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, which use spike protein as the generated antigen.
Given that the Public Health Industrial Complex has been forced to admit there are side effects and they can be serious, there is an opportunity. Yes, we could (and likely will) rub this sh!t sandwich in their face until they eat it, but Ivermectin has the potential to help millions of people on the cheap who have suffered vaccine harm.
If I read it wrong, this reinforced Ivermectin’s suitability as an early treatment option (at least) for people at high risk, and there’s no need for the so-called COVID vaccines or the real risks associated with them. The drug is cheap, widely available, and approved by the FDA for off-label use, if that matters. The real question is if IVM continues to produce these results is why was it blackballed along with Hydroxychloroquine, and who benefitted?
That might slow things down even now, but we know why the people shouting “public health” the loudest hid or buried the evidence of Ivermectin’s potential. It would have made the EUA vaccine declarations unnecessary and illegal, specifically violating Section 564 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act.
The EUAs are still illegal – section 564 never went away – and while I’m no lawyer, it seems to me that might mean the immunity granted to anyone making, moving, or mandating them is illegitimate.
And if that’s not enough, EUA requires fully informed consent, and we know that didn’t happen.
No, I do not expect anyone up the food chain to overly suffer for these deliberate wrongs, but a few wealthy folks might be able to lawfare some of these guilty “experts” into poverty.
I’ve got popcorn.
HT | MDPI & PAlexander Substack
