A man sexually assaulted seven children (now adults) and has since changed his gender. The official record indicates that a woman perpetrated these crimes because calling her him is a hate crime. She will be going to jail, but don’t you dare call her him.
At the time of the offences, Dixon was John Stephen Dixon, who transitioned to female in 2004 – after the period during which the offences took place.
Dixon was given an 18-year custodial sentence, with an additional two years to be served on extended licence. Dixon will also be subject to a Sexual Harm Prevention Order indefinitely.
The five girls and two boys, who were aged between six and 15 in the seven-year period from 1989 to 1996, were abused at locations in Crawley, Bexhill and Icklesham.
Dixon was also found not guilty of four indecent assaults.
He will go to a woman’s prison where, if recent history is any guide, “she” will rape the other inmates with her penis. But don’t you dare say she is a man. That’s a hate crime in the UK.
The Police eventually had to beg off and apologize for their poor behavior, but not because it is a distinction with a difference. They overstepped on the hate speech thing, given the increasingly less unique circumstances. It is not uncommon for male predators of children to change their gender. If they are charged as “women” for things they did as “men,” the data begins to look different.
England may be a slow pondering semi-socialist bureaucratic behemoth with a #woke complex, but they take lots of notes. Much of their COVID data was responsible for unraveling the lies perpetrated by the Global Public Health elites in the UK and abroad. So the question that stirred things here was why these assaults were being documented as committed by a woman.
Think about it.
If your historical sexual predator data is skewed with assaults by men who later declare themselves women are you more or less likely to look for male or female sex predators down the road? No, but you will get research indicating a shift in predation that isn’t real.
Yes, there is plenty of both. Just look at the public school data. But if you are allocating resources to prevent sexual assault on children – as opposed to normalizing it as the progressives are trying to do now – you’ll be focused in all the wrong places.
And if you are too #woke to even dare to look at women who used to be men because it’s a hate crime, not only will you not find predators, but more male predators will “make the switch (if only on paper) to hide their crimes.
And, bonus, if they do get caught, the idiots in law enforcement will lock them up with hundreds of women for them to abuse in an environment where it may also be a hate crime to accuse them.
So, denying the fundamental laws of science (biology) result in an inability to properly meet out justice to such a degree that what you do results in more injustice.
Nice work, cultural Marxists.
