The Rising Number of Public School Vaxx Clinics And the Lack of Informed Consent and Privacy Rights Protections - Granite Grok

The Rising Number of Public School Vaxx Clinics And the Lack of Informed Consent and Privacy Rights Protections

Vial Syringe weve come for the children

My local school district is one of many promoting a vaccine clinic on school property to Jab as many 5+ residents as possible. But the injection is still EUA or emergency use only. It is. Stop lying. And absent proper informed consent, jabbing even one person is unethical and should be criminal.

My “School District” has partnered up with Rite Aid to deliver unnecessary pharmaceutical treatments to minors, and here’s problem number one (from a reader).

 

nowhere on that Rite Aid “consent form” does it mention the RSA we are fortunate to have in NH, prohibiting a person’s medical info from being sent to the state, etc, without OUR SPECIFIC CONSENT.  In fact, for many months, pharmacies and I’m guessing all jab agents automatically sent this info to the state and on to the Feds, without asking a single person if it was ok.

 

And while ignorance of the law is no excuse, every pharmacy in the state knows the law.

 

Related: Stop Lying to People about Their COVID19 Vaccine Being Approved.

 

[I]n August last year, every retail pharmacy got an email saying “oh, by the way, in NH, you can’t send private medical info of patients without their consent.” This was MONTHS after it had already been done by most pharmacies. In fact, many pharmacies had parents make appointment ON A STATE VACCINE WEBSITE.

 

 

Related: Jab-Clinics Are Popping up at NH Public Schools (For Students and Staff…)

 

Privacy is also constitutionally protected in New Hampshire.

Before Rite Aid and the Merrimack School District jabs a single-arm, they need to attend a clinic on the legal requirements and the absence of not only informed consent as to the matter of the EUA drug but the privacy rights of the “patients.” But that won’t happen unless parents and taxpayers step in and not only insist but police the event to ensure these rights are explained.

And while we’re at it, someone should require them to include a reference to the more than 1000 studies published in peer-reviewed journals or papers that state that these vaccines are dangerous.

 

Here are the first ten papers from the link above.

 

Cerebral venous thrombosis after COVID-19 vaccination in the UK: a multicentre cohort study: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)01608-1/

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia with disseminated intravascular coagulation and death after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1052305721003414 3.

Fatal cerebral hemorrhage after COVID-19 vaccine: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33928772/

Myocarditis after mRNA vaccination against SARS-CoV-2, a case series: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666602221000409

Three cases of acute venous thromboembolism in women after vaccination against COVID-19: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213333X21003929

Acute thrombosis of the coronary tree after vaccination against COVID-19: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1936879821003988

US case reports of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis with thrombocytopenia after vaccination with Ad26.COV2.S (against covid-19), March 2 to April 21, 2020: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33929487/

Portal vein thrombosis associated with ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccine: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/langas/article/PIIS2468-1253(21)00197-7/

Management of cerebral and splanchnic vein thrombosis associated with thrombocytopenia in subjects previously vaccinated with Vaxzevria (AstraZeneca): position statement of the Italian Society for the Study of Hemostasis and Thrombosis (SISET): https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33871350/

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis after vaccination with COVID-19; a systematic review: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022510X21003014

 

That’s ten of over 1000 – Medical science and a lot of it.

But they will not stop jabbing children or convincing parents they need The Jab unless you educate yourself and start asking questions and (in NH) not following the law.

These are not disinterested non-partisan actors. They have a significant financial interest, and informed consent and a clear understanding of the privacy laws in New Hampshire are barriers to the pursuit of profit.

Kids are not vectors until they get the Jab and potential health risks from this inoculation are significant and much more dangerous than COVID.

Stop the clinics.

Demand transparency.

Make them follow the law.

 

 

 

>