This may be the first time we have heard about this nugget packed away in the NIH National Library of Medicine. Almost a year ago, they suspected that COVID19 vaccines might make you more susceptible to COVID19 and more serious diseases.
Published December 4th, 2020
Results of the study: COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated. Vaccines for SARS, MERS and RSV have never been approved, and the data generated in the development and testing of these vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic concern: that vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralising antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE).
In early August 2021. we shared some testimony of Dr. Dan Stocks (to a local school board) about the risk of anti-body-dependent enhancement. That went viral, and it may have been the first time many of us were familiarised with it. That was published eight months after the NIH archived research suggesting COVID19 vaccines were or could result in ADE and that they “may worsen COVID19 disease.”
But wait, there’s more.
Conclusions drawn from the study and clinical implications: The specific and significant COVID-19 risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials, as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient comprehension for informed consent.
The risk to Research subjects should be prominently disclosed. What about the general public? No one, not the media, not the state boards of health or their experts, nor the politicians, and certainly not the increasingly intolerable and intolerant Vax-Pimp Governor Chris Sununu, has told anyone, even quietly (forget prominently) that taking this experimental vaccine “may worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE).”
Quite the opposite. Not only that, this research was undertaken to suggest or ensure that recipients were fully informed of the potential risks before being vaccinated. The full report notes that,
Given the strong evidence that ADE is a non-theoretical and compelling risk for COVID-19 vaccines and the “laundry list” nature of informed consents, disclosure of the specific risk of worsened COVID19 disease from vaccination calls for a specific, separate, informed consent form and demonstration of patient comprehension in order to meet medical ethics standards. The informed consent process for ongoing COVID-19 vaccine trials does not appear to meet this standard.
While the COVID-19 global health emergency justifies accelerated vaccine trials of candidates with known liabilities, such an acceleration is not inconsistent with additional attention paid to heightened informed consent procedures specific to COVID-19 vaccine risks.
We have evidence of ADE. We have evidence that “COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated.”
We know there has been little if any effort to provide adequate warnings to anyone about these risks.
And the research has been on record for almost eleven months.
Patients were not comprehending the risks as required by “medical ethical standards” and nothing was done about that.
What happened? Politicians, bureaucrats, the media, big business, and even the entertainment industry went for a wall-to-wall 24/7/365 pressure campaign to get as many people vaccinated as possible.
Millions of people have had their immune systems weekend in the name of public health.
And they wonder why we don’t trust the government?