Formal Complaint to the NH Dept of Education against SAU 39

Dear Ms. Fenton:

Please see the following information obtained through a Right to Know (91-a) Request between myself and Mr. Steel, Superintendent of SAU 39.

A survey was given to students in the district which contained questions about their mental health status. I would like to file a formal complaint based on what appears to be violations of State and Federal Law governing non-academic surveys and data gathered on a student’s mental health.  In addition, I would like you to refer to the Educator Code of Conduct and Ethics, when conducting this investigation.

Since children do not have the capacity for free consent, it is critical that they not be exploited.  Asking children to give their personal and private mental health information to anyone without the proper education, credentials, or licensing, sends a message that this kind of information can be shared with anyone. While that may not have been the intention of this survey, it’s up to those who are in charge of their well-being to protect their sensitive personal data

Sincerely, 

Ann Marie Banfield 

Main Points Student Survey

 

Reopening Student Feedback

 

****

NEW HAMPSHIRE
RSA 186:11, IX-d :
IX-d. Require school districts to adopt a policy governing the administration of non- academic surveys or questionnaires to students.

The policy shall require school districts to notify a parent or legal guardian of a non-academic survey or questionnaire and its purpose. The policy shall provide that no student shall be required to volunteer for or submit to a non-academic survey or questionnaire, as defined in this paragraph, without written consent of a parent or legal guardian unless the student is an adult or an emancipated minor. The policy shall include an exception from the consent requirement for the youth risk behavior survey developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The policy shall also allow a parent or legal guardian to opt-out of the youth risk behavior survey developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The school district shall make such surveys or questionnaires available, at the school and on the school or school district’s website, for review by a student’s parent or legal guardian at least 10 days prior to distribution to students. In this paragraph, “non-academic survey or questionnaire” means surveys, questionnaires, or other documents designed to elicit information about a student’s social behavior, family life, religion, politics, sexual orientation, sexual activity, drug use, or any other information not related to a student’s academics.

In addition to state statute, federal law also requires informed consent from parents when assessing or treating the mental health of a student.

FEDERAL (ESSA)
`SEC. 4001. <<NOTE: 20 USC 7101.>> GENERAL PROVISIONS.

(a) Parental Consent.–

(1) In general.–

(A) Informed written consent.–A State, localeducational agency, or other entity receiving fundsunder this title shall obtain prior written, informedconsent from the parent of each child who is under 18years of age to participate in any mental-healthassessment or service that is funded under this titleand conducted in connection with an elementary school orsecondary school under this title.

(B) Contents.–Before obtaining the consentescribed in subparagraph (A), the entity shall providethe parent written notice describing in detail such mental health assessment or service, including thepurpose for such assessment or service, the provider of such assessment

The Belmont Report was written by the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. and says:

1. Respect for Persons. —

In most cases of research involving human subjects, respect for persons demands that subjects enter into the research voluntarily and with adequate information.

One special instance of injustice results from the involvement of vulnerable subjects. Certain groups, such as racial minorities, the economically disadvantaged, the very sick, and the institutionalized may continually be sought as research subjects, owing to their ready availability in settings where research is conducted. Given their dependent status and their frequently compromised capacity for free consent, they should be protected against the danger of being involved in research solely for administrative convenience, or because they are easy to manipulate as a result of their illness or socioeconomic condition.

The Belmont report affirms the importance of protecting persons with diminished autonomy, and that they enter into the research voluntarily and with adequate information. 

 

Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct

9.03 Informed Consent in Assessments

(a) Psychologists obtain informed consent for assessments, evaluations, or diagnostic services, as described in Standard 3.10, Informed Consent, except when (1) testing is mandated by law or governmental regulations; (2) informed consent is implied because testing is conducted as a routine educational, institutional, or organizational activity (e.g., when participants voluntarily agree to assessment when applying for a job); or (3) one purpose of the testing is to evaluate decisional capacity. Informed consent includes an explanation of the nature and purpose of the assessment, fees, involvement of third parties, and limits of confidentiality and sufficient opportunity for the client/patient to ask questions and receive answers.

(b) Psychologists inform persons with questionable capacity to consent or for whom testing is mandated by law or governmental regulations about the nature and purpose of the proposed assessment services, using language that is reasonably understandable to the person being assessed.

(c) Psychologists using the services of an interpreter obtain informed consent from the client/patient to use that interpreter, ensure that confidentiality of test results and test security are maintained, and include in their recommendations, reports, and diagnostic or evaluative statements, including forensic testimony, discussion of any limitations on the data obtained. (See also Standards 2.05, Delegation of Work to Others4.01, Maintaining Confidentiality; 9.01, Bases for Assessments; 9.06, Interpreting Assessment Results; and 9.07, Assessment by Unqualified Persons.)

The Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment (PPRA)

The Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment (PPRA) is a federal law that affords certain rights to parents of minor students with regard to surveys that ask questions of a personal nature. Briefly, the law requires that schools obtain written consent from parents before minor students are required to participate in any U.S. Department of Education funded survey, analysis, or evaluation that reveals information concerning the following areas:

  1. Political affiliations;
  2. Mental and psychological problems potentially embarrassing to the student and his/her family;
  3. Sex behavior and attitudes;
  4. Illegal, anti-social, self-incriminating and demeaning behavior;
  5. Critical appraisals of other individuals with whom respondents have close family relationships;
  6. Legally recognized privileged or analogous relationships, such as those of lawyers, physicians, and ministers;
  7. Religious practices, affiliations, or beliefs of the student or student’s parent*; or
  8. Income (other than that required by law to determine eligibility for participation in a program or for receiving financial assistance under such program.)

The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 contains a major amendment to PPRA that gives parents more rights with regard to the surveying of minor students, the collection of information from students for marketing purposes, and certain non-emergency medical examinations. In addition, an eight category of information (*) was added to the law.

You may read more about the specific changes to the law by selecting here.

Author

  • Ann Marie Banfield

    Ann Marie Banfield has been researching education reform for over a decade and actively supports parental rights, literacy and academic excellence in k-12 schools. You can contact her at: banfieldannmarie@gmail.com

    View all posts
Share to...