An (in)Human Rights Commission dismissed a case by a man who says he suffered discrimination at work. The problem? His gay boss didn’t like that he was a heterosexual. That’s the claim. The HRC said no, but a judge just said yes.
Federal Court Justice Janet M. Fuhrer laid it out this way:
“Based on the Commission’s lack of thoroughness in reviewing the grounds of Mr. Jagadeesh’s complaint, I grant the application for judicial review. The decision under review is set aside and the matter is returned to the Commission to conduct a fresh investigation, with a different investigator, of Mr. Jagadeesh’s complaint and render a new decision based on the full record.”
It sounds like, in the opinion of the court, the Human Rights Commission’s earlier investigations were biased. Well, no surprises there. It is their nature to discriminate. Human Rights Commissions, Anti-discrimination committees, and Bias response teams are all biased.
They are extra-judicial Social Injustice Star Chambers. Founded on intolerant left-wing college campuses and projected into the infrastructure of the state of local governments. They are built to discriminate. And anyone who is a Republican, White, Heterosexual, or Christian, is already at a considerable disadvantage.
The sorts of people who believe in and support these cabals tend to be social justice warriors, white-guilt or limousine liberals, feminist or queer theory experts, or activists that support them or fear them.
Being a straight white Republican Christian on a Human Rights Council is about as likely as being a small government, school choice, Conservative on the Nashua School Board. It happens but they make you hate every minute until they can get rid of you.
So, this is special.
For the court to force the HRC to reinvestigate the claim that a heterosexual was discriminated against because he was not gay (that, bitch) is something to behold.
But don’t get used to it.
| RedState
