I think, looking at all the document-hiding the FBI has done lately, the two most important things they are desperately and clumsily trying to hide are:
1. How the embedded progressive elites within the FBI interact with and feed fake stories to selected news media.
2. And how this part of the “Deep State” protects certain criminal elements within their incestuous faction from investigation or prosecution – while inventing crimes to charge political opponents with.
The criminal actions of FBI agents, lawyers, and their leadership in protecting Hillary Clinton from prosecution regarding a dozen criminal violations involving her secret server are undeniable. The mainstream media wants no part of looking into it for fear of losing their investment in her and exposing how much Obama, another investment, had to do with that same secret, illegal, server. Imagine headlines full of transcripts of what those two secretly emailed each other before the November 8, 2016 disaster changed liberal lives forever.
While Americans suffer relentless media driven diversions from an historic dissection of the inner workings of what was once the FBI, former federal government Deep State actors carry on the expected attack against this rogue administration that dared interfere with them. Their typical Alinsky plan always includes:
RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”
“Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)”
If you want to see a perfect example of how far the Deep State will go to follow Alinsky’s Rules look no farther than Whitehouse Press secretary Sarah Sanders, who had the audacity to dine in a college town in Virginia.
Yes, a New York transplant restaurateur who opened The Red Hen Restaurant in this small town used her golden opportunity to express her inner hate by asking Sarah Sanders and her family to leave. A typical progressive moonbat response to anything that offends them is to take some sort of revenge. But it is always couched as “for the greater good” because the other person, and in this case, her kids, are evil.
But that is just the beginning.
Martin L Pengelly, a writer with The Guardian, teamed up with an Obama ethics expert to come up with a doozy of a story about how Sarah Sanders, using her government email to write a comment about the pathetic incident, may have committed a crime.
The progressive ethics expert, as you would expect, has no ethics. That is how liberals operate – everything they claim to be is simply backward.
The character who came up with the idea for Martin L. Pengelly’s fake story is named Walter Shaub. In 2013, he was appointed by President Barack Obama to a five-year term as the director of the Office of Government Ethics where he found no ethics violations. Once President Trump took office Shaub was so outraged he had to resign. And since that day he has been coming up with all sorts of ethics violations against President Trump. In this case it is Sarah Sanders because his past attacks against Trump fizzled out.
In this case, Shaub and Martin L Pengelly actually mention a law Sanders has supposedly violated by using a government mail to say what happened at the leftist restaurant, it is 5 CFR 2635.702(a). One glaring problem, this federal statute says no such thing. This law is about using your office to enrich yourself.
Schaub has a twitter account and posted this bit of fakery:
Walter Shaub Retweeted Sarah Sanders –
“Sarah, I know you don’t care even a tiny little bit about the ethics rules, but using your official account for this is a clear violation of 5 CFR 2635.702(a). It’s the same as if an ATF agent pulled out his badge when a restaurant tried to throw him/her out.”
What’s next for us Deep State watchers?
Back to the newest documents released by the criminal insiders at the FBI. Don’t be diverted from history in the making by fake media and silly fat men posing as ethics experts.
(And why are so many of these crooked FBI people from Harvard?)