What Does Keeping the Paris Agreement Alive Actually Mean?

by
Steve MacDonald

Paris Agreement wont change the climateFrom the EU to California to Nashua and Portsmouth, New Hampshire, politicians and pundits are promising to keep the Paris Agreement alive despite President Trump’s exit. But what does that actually mean? It depends.

If you’re Turkey, it means you expect bitter Paris Accord clingers to write you a check to pay for the cost of compliance. If you’re China, you build a record number of coal-fired generating plants through 2030 (when Paris ends). Same deal in India. And as for Russia, they’ve gamed the system such that they can increase emissions willy nilly and still call it “compliance.”

Others have a plan that is no plan beyond meaningless policy pronouncements and the lofty words of their leaders.

Emissions being both an elusive and movable target make the whole exercise pointless rubbish whose sole purpose appears to have been to hobble the US Economy while milking it for global Carbon Custody dollars and endless Alimony payments.

If it were a war, a common turn of phrase for progressives, The Paris Agreement is the enemies expert at industrial espionage, welcomed with open arms. It is a computer virus that slows down your systems so others can catch up.

America agrees to make its electricity more expensive, its economy harder to grow, while it slowly strangles small business owners and job and wage growth to pay the Global Climate Mafia

A very one-sided arrangement right up until America decided not to play. No it’s a no sided agreement with people thinking they can still take a side.

The mayors of Portsmouth and Nashua, or any of the other progressive stooges, can talk all they want about independent compliance, but unless they plan to pay the UN protection money they are not keeping the Paris agreement alive.

Sure, you can replace your weatherstripping, make public employees drive toxic battery powered vehicles, even pretend you can make your corner of the civilized world more civilized by bilking locals to pay for solar or wind, but real civilization needs electricity, and in New Hampshire you need heat. Those things are real while pandering to the climate cults fantasy du jour is not.

The world can’t afford it, and the world knows it. They need an American Government run by progressives willing to plunder hundreds of billions of dollars from American jobs and job creators, and then give it to the UN, the most unproductive thing in human history.

But keep up the show. The libtards and their media homunculi (or maybe I’ve got that reversed) can continue their auto-erotic obsession with Paris, complete with their virtual sandwich boards declaring that the end is near, again, and again, and…wait, again, and it’s all your fault.

It’s OK.

They’ll need that hate to keep their dark little hearts warm on cold New Hampshire nights so that they might live long enough to discover that it really was all a load of BS, just like the rhetoric surrounding The Paris Climate Accords.

And those politicians claiming otherwise? If they were on the take then at least they were cunning. If not, then they are just stupid sheep willing to risk your families generational livelihood for nothing.

That’s the Paris Agreement in a nutshell.

WUWT

Author

  • Steve MacDonald

    Steve is a long-time New Hampshire resident, blogger, and a member of the Board of directors of The 603 Alliance. He is the owner of Grok Media LLC and the Managing Editor of GraniteGrok.com, a former board member of the Republican Liberty Caucus of New Hampshire, and a past contributor to the Franklin Center for Public Policy.

Share to...