The Duke Women’s Center has launched a 9-week course titled, The Duke Men’s Project,
“”…for “male-identified” students that discusses male privilege, patriarchy, “the language of dominance,” rape culture, pornography, machismo and other topics.””
Clinton Family History is probably not included under “other topics” but would make an excellent edition under the heading: “Destroying the lives of women who have been sexually abused by your charismatic and well-connected husband so that you can ride his coattails to positions of political power.”
The report adds that,
The student newspaper’s editorial board endorsed the new program yesterday, insisting it was “not a reeducation camp being administered by an oppressed group in the service of the feminization of American society.”
What other choice did they have? Refusing to endorse the program would result in every male-identifying member of the paper’s staff having to take both the standard sensitivity training and the 9-week course that isn’t a re-education camp being administered by an oppressed group in the service of the feminization of American society.
Meanwhile, over at Legal Insurrection, they ask,
Shouldn’t campus feminists have a special place to contemplate their toxicity, too?
The reasons why not are probably covered in week one of The Duke Men’s Project.
Exit Question: If there was or is such thing as a Duke Men’s Center, how would the SJW’s react if they offered a 9-week course for female-identified students on anything other than “how to get men to a reeducation camp being administered by an oppressed group in the service of the feminization of American society.”
