The Heritage Action Scorecard vs. New Hampshire “Republicans”

NHGOP WoodshedThe Heritage Action Scorecard is an excellent resource for measuring whether or not someone who is elected as a Republican is actually voting like one. It measures action against conservative principles to give a more realistic picture of a politician’s national platform mettle.

Eric Cantor, for example–he who was just exorcised from congress by the meaningless Tea Party candidate in a state (and district) half a heartbeat away from the mother ship in DC–received a Heritage Action score of 55% in the last congress and 53% in this one.  Barely half a Republican.  No one should be surprised to see him go and yet they are.

Looking north, we have Senator Kelly Ayotte, who received an unimpressive 74% from the 11-12 session, and currently rates at a numbing 54% this session. McCain and Graham–for reference–are at 51%.

In the 11-12 session former congressman Charlie Bass got a 45%, and former congressman Guinta scored a 68%.  (If you want my opinion, in CD-1, Dan Innis would likley score lower than Guinta.)

Scott Brown, while a Senator in Massachusetts scored a stellar 39%.

The New Hampshire Republicans need to ask themselves why they can’t do better than this and to decide what they are prepared to do about that?

Author

  • Steve is a long-time New Hampshire resident, an award-winning blogger, and a member of the Board of Directors of The 603 Alliance and the National Heritage Center for Constitutional Studies. He is the owner of Grok Media LLC and the Managing Editor, Executive Editor, assistant editor, Editor, content curator, and more (yes, there's more) at GraniteGrok.com. Steve is also a former board member of the Republican Liberty Caucus of New Hampshire, the Republican Volunteer Coalition, and has worked for or with many state and local campaigns and grassroots groups, and is a past contributor to the Franklin Center for Public Policy.

    View all posts
Share to...