Ann Kuster, the Democrat Parties representative to Congressional District two in New Hampshire, got flummoxed after reading a question from a constituent about Benghazi. Here we see Klueless Kuster making Carol Shea-Porter look lucid.
New Hampshire Democratic Rep. Ann Kuster clumsily refused to answer a question on the Benghazi attacks during a recent town hall, frantically looking to the moderator for assistance instead.
A video uploaded Sunday to Youtube shows the congresswoman reading a prepared question from a constituent about whether she supports a House resolution authorizing the creation of a select committee to investigate the September 11, 2012 attacks on a Beghazi consulate, which killed Libyan ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans.
Kuster at first nervously mumbled “I don’t have . . . It’s a Senate thing — I don’t think we have anything about that in the House.” The congresswoman had just read out the name and description of HR 36, the House resolution creating the investigative committee.
Things got weirder after a constituent called her out for dismissing “the rest of this” question:
CONSTITUENT: Can you address Benghazi?
KUSTER: [Deer in headlights look]
CONSTITUENT: What are you gonna do about Benghazi?
KUSTER: [Nervously shuffles notecards]
CONSTITUENT: Why isn’t Benghazi at the top of your issue?
KUSTER: Well, I’m certainly not here to talk about it. We’re here to talk about the Middle East.
MULTIPLE CONSTITUENTS: It is in the Middle East!
CONSTITUENT: Libya is like, right in the middle of the Middle East.
Libya is technically a western boundary of what is defined traditionally as the Middle East but the Middle East it is.
No Matter. Kuster doesn’t care about Benghazi because when the sitting President, secretary of state, and our representative to the UN are all Democrats who lie about why four Americans died, on TV, over and over, and do so for weeks, hide witnesses, obstruct investigation, lie some more, it’s a non issue for you. Talking about it could hamper your status with future candidate Clinton, who is responsible.
If it were a Republican president though? She’d have all her party supplied talking points in a row.
You know, I bet she could tell you all about the Democrat talking points on Ambassador Joe Wilson, who lied a good deal, all of it uncovered by a Senate committee investigation, and several other foreign intelligence agencies. But all of that was ignored for the benefit of a press-fired partisan dog an pony special prosecution that could come up with nothing but a trumped up charge of perjury against a guy whose only “crime” was working for Vice President Dick Cheney. A Democrat ‘exposed’ desk jockey Valerie Plame. And Saddam was trying to buy Yellowcake. Wilson lied, Plame became the Democrat victim du jour (book ,movie), but she didn’t die, not even of embarrassment.
But on Benghazi, Kuster didn’t even have the guts to be honest. Four Americans were left to die and our President took the night off. The Sec-o-State, Hillary Clinton was complicit front to back, but the entire duck and cover crowd could care less about four dead Americans or a dead Ambassador. All they cared about was how those deaths and that attack would affect the election and their political future.
I will say that whoever shot the video should consider themselves lucky. At least now we know why Kuster likes to grab cameras away from people recording her. She looks like an ignorant fool when the video gets out.
H/T Kurt and CFSNH
