Organizing for Acorn Squash is not alone this holiday season in politicizing the Holiday dinner table. The DCCC is back with its most recent installment of the DCCC Cheat Sheet. Emphasis on Cheat. Why?
You hate the TEA Party, so let me count the ways.
Let’s face it: we all have a crazy Tea Party relative (or two) who just loves bashing President Obama — even on Thanksgiving.
If you’re worried that your Thanksgiving table will start looking like the set of Fox & Friends, we’ve got just the thing for you:
Meanwhile at the MSNBC table…
No. We won’t go there. /shudder
So you follow the link ( I removed that one) and…they collect your data and cell phone number so they can text propaganda to you 24/7/365. It’ll be like having your own little pocket TelePrompTer, there to guide you on your yellow brick road of lies to the progressive utopia that is just around that next left turn. Just don’t trip over your own bu–sh–, contradictions, the economic ruin, burdensome regulations, piles of food stamps, people lined up at unemployment or to collect welfare, or the mounds upon mounds of hypocrisy on your way to the substandard crime-riddled concrete and steel workforce housing neighborhood that awaits you.
This years sheet is called ‘know your stuffing.’ No, you don’t have to pass it to learn what’s in it, but if your IQ is even slightly over 70 you might begin to question the veracity of the claims (or at least be able to recite them on your own without a cheat-sheet). Given that lying is the policy position of choice for all Democrats, on all issues, nothing they say can be taken at face value, or even two-face value for that matter. The stuffing cheat sheet is no different.
Jonah Goldberg at NRO adds…
I love the defensive tone here. While the Democrats are the ones who want Americans to check their iPhones at the Thanksgiving table for the latest instructions from the Ministry of Information, they’re posing as if someone else is to blame for it. If only those crazy Tea Party relatives stayed home, it wouldn’t be necessary for us to create an army of agitprop-spouting drones. It’s the conversational equivalent of the doctrine of preemption. If it weren’t all so comically lame, it would be disturbing.
Lame, year, after, year, after year…