I Guess We’re not Hiding Weapons in Syria Then?

smart bombWe couldn’t launch a strike in Benghazi.  No one could go in and rescue anyone.  The White House didn’t want more camel noses under the Benghazi Annex tent.  So they let those people burn.

But we can send strikes into Syria.  So it follows naturally that we must not be collecting or smuggling weapons or transferring them to clandestine locations to hand off to suspicious characters in some dusty back ally somewhere.  Instead “we’ll hand them off” but launching, dropping, tossing or otherwise dispensing them at the supposed shared enemy of our rendezvous-ees, choosing the side of one terror group over another,  even though the last one-thousand-and-one times we checked, Democrats were supposed to be against that kind of thing.

Wait a minute.  Do we even have any bombs left after the sequester?

Author

  • Steve MacDonald

    Steve is a long-time New Hampshire resident, award-winning blogger, and a member of the Board of Directors of The 603 Alliance. He is the owner of Grok Media LLC and the Managing Editor, Executive Editor, assistant editor, Editor, content curator, complaint department, Op-ed editor, gatekeeper (most likely to miss typos because he has no editor), and contributor at GraniteGrok.com. Steve is also a former board member of the Republican Liberty Caucus of New Hampshire, The Republican Volunteer Coalition, has worked for or with many state and local campaigns and grassroots groups, and is a past contributor to the Franklin Center for Public Policy.

    View all posts
Share to...