Everything You Need To Know about The Claim the IRS “also” Targeted Progressive Groups

Remember that the IRS is supposed to look at groups in the normal course of approving their non-profit status and that some percentage of them will get extra scrutiny by default.  And as the left looks around the IRS scandal Desert for cover, remember what the Inspector General has to say about it.

He said that while 30 percent of groups that had the word “progressive” in their name were given extra scrutiny, 100 percent of groups with “tea party,” “patriot” or “9/12” in their names were pulled out for strict scrutiny, which involved what the IRS since has said were invasive and inappropriate questions.

“While we have multiple sources of information corroborating the use of tea party and other related criteria we described in our report, including employee interviews, e-mails, and other documents, we found no indication in any of these other materials that ‘progressives’ was a term used to refer cases for scrutiny for political campaign intervention,”Mr. George wrote.

What do you call it again when  you separate people or groups out like this and make all of their lives more difficult?  Democrat Policy, right?

So what’s next?  Blame the targeting of 100% of tea party groups on a video?

Author

  • Steve is a long-time New Hampshire resident, an award-winning blogger, and a member of the Board of Directors of The 603 Alliance and the National Heritage Center for Constitutional Studies. He is the owner of Grok Media LLC and the Managing Editor, Executive Editor, assistant editor, Editor, content curator, and more (yes, there's more) at GraniteGrok.com. Steve is also a former board member of the Republican Liberty Caucus of New Hampshire, the Republican Volunteer Coalition, and has worked for or with many state and local campaigns and grassroots groups, and is a past contributor to the Franklin Center for Public Policy.

    View all posts
Share to...