As someone who is currently entangled in and fighting the tentacles of Leviathan over various firearm issues and is constantly wiping the red ink from my brow it heartens me that there’s a no-holds bar a$$ kicking consitutionalist in the Senate and he’s throwin’ down, taking names, and outing meaty pieces of Leviathans corpus.
Watch Constitutional Cruz (C.C for short) shred the pols poised to protect you from yourself because they use the constitution as a mere suggestion box and he calls ’em on it.
“The question that I would pose to the senior senator from California is,” said Cruz to Feinstein, “Would she deem it consistent with the Bill of Rights for Congress to engage in the same endeavor that we are contemplating doing with the Second Amendment in the context of the First or Fourth Amendment, namely, would she consider it constitutional for Congress to specify that the First Amendment shall apply only to the following books and shall not apply to the books that Congress has deemed outside the protection of the Bill of Rights? Likewise, would she think that the Fourth Amendment’s protection against searches and seizures could properly apply only to the following specified individuals and not to the individuals that Congress has deemed outside the protection of the Bill of Rights?
(h/t Weekly Standard)
It’s particularly amusing to the astute observer that Feinstein’s response to a simple question is a feeble heart string tug in hopes to elevate the Pathos and drown the Logos in tears. Bzzz.. Wrong Mrs. Feinstein. You’re a Senator in name only. You’re a charade that’s betrayed the very oath you swore to protect. You do not understand the constitution one iota.