I hope you’re not tired of the Lindsey Clancy memes and commentary yet, because despite the hung jury and mistrial, the defense argument still stands as the reason it went down that way.
And a lot of people were paying attention. The feminists came out to defend her, arguing she can’t be held criminally accountable. Hormones and junk. Which runs oddly counter to a century of feminist arguments about women generally.
We’ll skip the brief history of feminists neutering men and try to stay on topic, but men aren’t telling boys they might be girls unless they are married to liberal women or getting rich selling it.
Anyway,
Clancy. Lindsey. Criminally accountable. Not yet. Hung jury. Mistrial. Buy more popcorn. It’s as good as not guilty if you’re one of those feminist warrior women who think postpartum abortions are the next big thing. It’s a progressive thing, by the way, which is to say also a communist thing and a Nazi thing, and well, those are your scientific mentors, but that doesn’t seem to bother them much.
Same politics, policies, and goals as the American Left, including the ritual cleansing at both ends of the arc of life, but that’s not the only potential problem. And I’m not saying I agree with all the what-ifs in the video below, but some of it could stick regardless.
Check this out.
Watch on the ‘Grok Rumble Channel if the Embedded Video does not load.
I guess the question, given the current state of things, is what this says about or does to feminism as a progressive project. The women in pink already did their “she’s innocent ‘cuz reasons” thing. And has this created a new political problem for the progressives in the feminist movement?
Do politicians now have to answer whether they’d find Clancy guilty or innocent and why?
Everyone should be asking.
It could change everything.
Video credit: (@docrich): https://www.youtube.com/shorts/kzI6_vTNjro. She says to tip Steve Mudflap McGrew on X.
