For years, I have marveled as so-called feminists made excuses, even defending the practice of men in garish clown make-up, reading books to kids at local libraries. The same feminists ignore men wearing stereotypical garb from an era during which they claim women were oppressed, or who do drag shows, which are over-sexualized performances wearing the oppressive clothing, clown-like make-up.
We’ve even got men pretending to be women when they shoot up churches and schools, which cannot be helping the brand. And still, they defend them. Maybe not the acts themselves, but the right to expect the world to know that some unhinged “woman” with She/Her pronouns, penis and all, committed evil on a mass scale.
The same women would disown, bully, and dox a woman if she admitted she voted for Trump.
Lefties, I am here to tell you that your thing is broken, and the path you are on will be the end of you, even when the media still has your back.
Jesse Van Rootselaar, wounded twenty-five, and killed, “his 39-year-old mother, his 11-year-old stepbrother, a 39-year-old teacher, three 12-year-old girls, and two boys, 12 and 13.“
CNN “reported” that “the suspect is an 18-year-old woman.” The very next sentence? “She was born biologically male and transitioned about six years ago, police said.” CNN also referred to the shooter as “an 18-year-old female resident of the town.”
The New York Times used female pronouns for the shooter, stating that “she killed her mother and stepbrother before fatally shooting several others, and later herself.”
The Associated Press merely referred to the shooter using female pronouns, without even disclosing to readers that police identified him as male.
Reuters’s headline ran, “Canadian police identify 18-year-old woman as suspect in mass school shooting.” Reuters did acknowledge that the shooter had been “born male,” but not until the 11th paragraph, and only after describing Van Rootselaar as a “woman” and using female pronouns for him throughout.
USA Today acknowledged the transgender identity in the second paragraph of the story but still used female pronouns for the shooter throughout.
If ever you wanted to speak truth to power, it is when a man puts on a dress and kills a bunch of people, including innocent kids, three of whom were probably being taught that you had their back (the girls).
Not so much. Not in bathrooms, locker rooms, sports teams, prisons, or while their bodies grow cold because some monster you pals in the progressive culture created did the thing you also claimed disarming everyone would end.
It’s okay to be wrong, but there’s a lot wrong there, and you are so bound up you can’t even see your cultural culpability.
That’s sad, but what’s worse is that someone else always pays for it, too often, with their life.
