Lots of New Hampshire Democrat names in this Robby Mook/Podesta Email. Sylvia Larsen, Teri Norelli, Jim Demers, ‘Billy and the Senator’ (the Shaheens) Lou D’Allesandro, and is that “Sullivan” Kathy Sullivan? That doesn’t matter. Kathy is just another Clinton water-carrier in party leadership, and we know what that means. Rigged.
So why ask for your attention on this matter? There is a paragraph in this email that deserves particular attention because given what we know now, it was total bullshirt when written.
From: robbymook2015@gmail.com, on April 1,2015…
Subject: NH read out
Absolutely everyone we talked with agreed that you should be doing small events that aren’t packaged or produced–and that you should go directly to regular voters. Everyone was on board with not having a state leadership structure or rolling out big political endorsements. People loved it when we said how you insisted on earning the nomination and intended to fight for every vote.
Bwahahahaha!
So, Mook emails Podesta and others to report on how he got Granite State Democrats to agree on,
- Small events that are not packaged or produced,
- Not having State Leadership structure/roll out endorsements,
- Hillary is looking to earn the nomination and fight for every vote.
Sorry to be repetitive but, Bwahahahaha!
1- Nothing about Hillary or her events is anything other than packaged and produced. She can’t do them any other way. She can barely do them that way. As an example, the small “table discussions” early on with the Scooby van were packaged and produced. Very safe. No risk. Canned. But they were sold as the opposite and New Hampshire’s brightest dim bulbs went for that? Did they believe it? Are they idiots or just Jack-boot licking Clinton sycophants? All of the above?
2 – State leadership includes Ray Buckley, a long-time DNC vice-chair (and Clinton bitch) and part and parcel of the rigging of the primary. That matters because when the plan is to rig the election you don’t need endorsements. You don’t need to risk anyone running for state or local office who might get ground into pulp by the tsunami of baggage that comes with a Clinton. But Hillary should at least show up even when showing up is Kabuki theater to cover for the centrally-planned outcome.
You know, DNC, third world dictators pretend to have elections so stupid people will think they had a voice. The despots think their people are idiots. The entire Democrat machine thinks its registered voters are idiots, too.
3- Hillary never had any intention (see also need) of earning or fighting for anything. Not in New Hampshire. Not anywhere. In the end, the State and National Party wanted to rig this so she couldn’t lose, lied to everyone, and in the case of New Hampshire, screwed 68% its voters, who chose Bernie over Hillary, in the primary.
So, did any of these people ‘on the team‘ in New Hampshire know the party apparatus was going to use all its resources to make sure Hillary was their nominee? Did they know she didn’t need endorsements or to do much of anything but show up so the press could report that she was here? (Did it ever occur to any of them that in future cycles the Party would be equally willing to screw over a candidate they supported?)
The media never really got interested in any of this, not even now, after we’ve read the inside scoop in the words of Clinton and DNC leadership.
Another under-reported story; there was an internal war on the left over which side was going to commit the most voter fraud in the primaries, Sanders or Clinton. They both did it. But the 50 state home field advantage the DNC had given to Clinton is tough to overcome, even when you are winning primaries. Somehow, Hillary still won when she lost.
In the end, they bought Sanders off somehow to get him in line. Maybe they have dirt on him? Threatened his wife or himself? Made him an offer he couldn’t refuse? They had too.
If the ‘Independent’ socialist-Senator from Vermont ran third-party, he’d have gotten more votes in a general election than Hillary.
When Bernie won in New Hampshire (by 30 points), it prompted former Hillary Clinton adviser Neera Tanden to ask, “What is wrong with people in New Hampshire?”
She means Democrats, which is a simple problem because they are “simple” people. They are stupid. Not because they prefer a communist over a miserable, power hungry, Harpy, but because they are electorally immoral. And they are electorally immoral because winning is all that matters, by any means. They must win because they think they are intellectually superior. They know how to run your life, teach your kids, and spend your money. And they will give everyone’s rights away to a central government to see that it happens without having the sense to have learned from history what the really means.
Democrat voters are just useful idiots, nothing more, New Hampshire Democrats included. And a scarce few of you will join them at the top of their new world order, should they achieve it. The rest of you will be tossed aside. And no, they do not care if you are a child, black, a woman, Hispanic, Native American, disabled, elderly, blue-collar, transgender, employed, unemployed, insured, uninsured, immigrant, or some combination of the above.
What makes you different does not make you special to Democrats. It makes you a tool to help them achieve power. Once they have it, they no longer need you. You can go back in the drawer if you behave or out with the trash. If you had any sense you’d see that. But then you wouldn’t be their useful idiot, would you?
You wouldn’t repeat their lies, hide their dirty laundry, ignore their criminality, or promote their failed policies.
You’d be free to be yourself instead of a tool.
