MicroGroks
Mr. Hodges is running for the New Hampshire House again, (Hillsborough 7) because someone needs to warm that seat, and the democrats would rather it be Hodges than someone who won’t vote the way Terri Norelli tells them. But being in the House does not automatically make you qualified to serve again and in the case of Hodges it may actually be a reason not to support him at all.
Is prostituting the fate of your local economy to outsiders your idea of good leadership? The democrats will tell you it provides the state with revenue, but they will never admit that it is actually a broad based energy tax just waiting to be pilfered for more wasteful spending, or that the long term economic impact will decrease growth, cost jobs, and drive business away through artificially and unpredictably higher energy costs.
Why Shea-Porterian and Hodesian Economics Fails
The Granite State Fair Tax folks are back trolling for a broad based tax on the idea that it is more fair? Fair to whom? That’s always the question but it never tries to address why we need a tax, and why we need to control how much of it the government can collect, or …
I normally do not put up entire posts from other folks, but Neal Boortz has this one down pat. In it, he demonstrates the absurdity of the what Federal Govt does by taking away, via taxes, that is a good sum of money that for most middle class Americans. It demonstrates the angst of the …
Let’s put the taking of Federal Income taxes from you into an absurd scenario Read More »
Capital Briefs in this weeks edition of Human Events, reminds us that it took over 200 years for the US government to accumulate a national debt of 2.19 Trillion. Mr Obama exceeded that sum in just 19 months by adding another 2.56 Trillion to the national debt….and neither Paul Hodes, nor Carol SEIU-Porter, did anything …
If you believe the rhetoric Carol Seiu-Porter and Paul ‘Hot Dog’ Hodes are bulwarks of the middle class lifestyle and protectors of the elderly. So what would they make of this, from a letter sent to Nancy Pelosi on Tuesday?
If we had a real surplus they wouldn’t need to rob the JUA fund. They would drop the idea of selling off 60 million in state land. In fact, they’d stop all the hand-wringing about the budget.
Thirty nine democrats voted with republicans to hold off the adjournment, but the vote fell short, leaving the tax hikes on the books as the House leaves to defend two years of excessive spending, massive debt, the democrats unpopular health care plan, the failure to utilize Pay-Go as promised, the inability to even try and form a budget, repeated ethical lapses by liberal law makers, and a host of other ills that have driven their approval rating to historical lows.
Don’t expect ShaHodeSheaPorter to wrestle with this conundrum; while running for office in 2008 they insisted that the Bush Tax cuts were "for the rich," or "the wealthiest Americans." The class warfare rhetoric made the case that Republicans didn’t provide tax relief for anyone else, and the democrats promised to remedy this the moment they …
