Is it Time for California To Make Indecent Exposure Legal? - Granite Grok

Is it Time for California To Make Indecent Exposure Legal?

California Pedofornia Bear Flag - GraniteGrok

A Transgender student has been removed from Martin Luther King High School in Riverside, California, after showing more than the content of his character in the girl’s locker room.

Sorry, you could say he exposed his character as well. He exposed himself, spit on girls in the locker room, and then was involved in a fight with a girl afterward.

 


That Real™ girl has got some stones for not having any, you know, stones. She’s all up in his/her grill for the bad behavior, and her opponent is twice her size. She’s not taking any of whatever else it is they’ve got going on there. The report does say they have a history of aggression towards each other, and this is not their first throwdown.

I’m thinking this is a common problem, and the administration was afraid to take any of it too seriously, but 5.5 million views on Twitter changes things. Or does it? Deliberately exposing your junk where “there are present other persons to be offended or annoyed thereby” violates California Penal Code § 314 PC.

A conviction can mean up to six months in jail and up to 1000.00 dollars in fines. A second offense could result in a trip to a State Prison. You are also required to register as a Tier One sex offender for the next ten years.

There is no trans-exception in the law that I can find. This suggests that deliberate exposure in the presence of people offended or annoyed is illegal.

 

314. Every person who willfully and lewdly, either:

1. Exposes his person, or the private parts thereof, in any public place, or in any place where there are present other persons to be offended or annoyed thereby; or,

2. Procures, counsels, or assists any person so to expose himself or take part in any model artist exhibition, or to make any other exhibition of himself to public view, or the view of any number of persons, such as is offensive to decency, or is adapted to excite to vicious or lewd thoughts or acts, is guilty of a misdemeanor.

 

I predict no charges will be filed based on 314 PC. It runs counter to the liberal notion that private parts do not indicate a person’s sex or gender, and claiming they felt otherwise at the time is a far greater offense to a Liberal.

They seem hellbent on making pedophilia legal; how difficult could it be to change this law to allow indecent exposure without consequence?

 

 

>