Is it still a secret that states and nations collected years of data showing that children were never a vector for infection or the spread of SARS-CoV2? It was evident after the first two weeks of tyranny in March/April 2020 and confirmed by mountains of evidence since, but there has been one change.
Kids became a vector for infection and spread if they got The Jab™. The vaccine made them more susceptible, erasing their natural immunity.
Pfizer, which hasn’t exactly admitted this or any other failure (despite all the doc dumps and evidence in them), recently funded research to analyze “records from Kaiser Permanente Southern California [that] included patients who tested for COVID-19 at an emergency department, urgent care, or outpatient setting, along with being diagnosed with acute respiratory infection.”
Children were only counted as vaccinated if they received a second or third shot two or more weeks before being exposed to COVID-19. Children were excluded if they only received one dose, received any doses from a different company, or did not follow the recommended dosing schedule.
After adjusting for factors such as age and sex, researchers estimated just 12 percent effectiveness against medically-attended encounters for children who completed the three-dose primary series.
Confidence intervals crossed well over one, indicating that the effectiveness might actually be worse or even negative.
Pfizer’s conclusion? “Updated vaccines will likely be needed to maintain protection against contemporary Omicron strains in young children,” they wrote.”
I’m no virologist, chemist, or pharmaceutical engineer, but I can read, and New Hampshire’s data was no different than any other state I’ve reviewed. Until the vaccines were stuck into kids, few ever had to be hospitalized, and none died. These initial details denied to parents have since made children more likely to catch co-variants or the flu, to which we can add heart problems and an increased risk of cancer.
But is this research, while not great news for kiddie-jabbing enthusiasts, even telling the whole truth? The Pfizer/Kaiser Permanente research has been panned by experts outside the Public Health Industrial Complex, including Dr. Malone and Dr. Bhattacharya.
The newly reported results are based on a test-negative design, which is inappropriate for measuring effectiveness, said Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, professor of health policy at Stanford University.
“The design starts with children who are already seeing a doctor and then makes strong and unsupportable statistical assumptions to derive the probability of seeing a doctor for vaccinated and unvaccinated children,” Dr. Bhattacharya, who was not involved in the research, told The Epoch Times via email.
There are other flaws, it seems, which is not surprising. Even in failure, Pfizer fails, not that it matters. The solution is always the same these days. Get another shot and listen to them lie about the risks, with doctors, the media, and the Pfederal government hand in hand.
HT | Epoch Times
