Conspiracy Theory No Longer: Unregulated US Climate Engineering Created Heat Waves In Europe

by Steve MacDonald

With a straight face and without blinking – as if this was some well-regarded scientific practice and not an outlandish conspiratorial Alt-Righ bugbear – the UK Guardian has a piece exploring research about the effects of geo (or climate engineering).

Reminiscent of the Persian-Cat-stroking evil mastermind whose quest for a global paradise (new world order) goes horribly wrong.

A geoengineering technique designed to reduce high temperatures in California could inadvertently intensify heatwaves in Europe, according to a study that models the unintended consequences of regional tinkering with a changing climate.

The paper shows that targeted interventions to lower temperature in one area for one season might bring temporary benefits to some populations, but this has to be set against potentially negative side-effects in other parts of the world and shifting degrees of effectiveness over time.

The authors of the study said the findings were “scary” because the world has few or no regulations in place to prevent regional applications of the technique, marine cloud brightening, which involves spraying reflective aerosols (usually in the form of sea salt or sea spray) into stratocumulus clouds over the ocean to reflect more solar radiation back into space.

Didn’t anyone warn them that it isn’t nice to fool Mother Nature?

We’ve gone from conspiracy theory to mad scientism in need of government regulation, which seems like a bad idea given that, like COVID, the government did this.

“Our study is very specific,” said Jessica Wan, who is part of the research team led by UC San Diego’s Scripps Institution of Oceanography. “It shows that marine cloud brightening can be very effective for the US west coast if done now, but it may be ineffective there in the future and could cause heatwaves in Europe.”

Heat waves are a side effect of US geoengineering, which was meant to create cooling. Another progressive idea produced the opposite effect. Who is surprised by that? And that opposite effect, regardless of any local positive changes, are important.

Heat waves can cause wildfires, which can cause destabilization. What else did the scientists learn? What didn’t make it into the published study?

In the Guardian’s article, as in every other article following the unexpected disclosure of the San Fransisco project, salt-blinded journalists failed to ask the most important question that every single reader wants to know: Where else in the world are they testing weather modification technologies by spraying chemicals into the air?

Besides chemtrails and salt sprayers, what other kinds of ‘solar geoengineering’ are going on?

There’s also a piece in the New York Times that mentions how there is no government regulation over geoengineering, which is also interesting. In New Hampshire, we had a bill this past session that would regulate geoengineering. HB1700 would prohibit “the intentional release of polluting emissions, including cloud seeding, weather modification, excessive electromagnetic radio frequency, and microwave radiation and making penalties for violation of such prohibition.” It came out of a committee inexpedient to legislate and died on the floor of the State House. I have not looked, but I expect there was a fair amount of ridicule and ranting about crazy conspiracies.

Not so crazy. And now “researchers” are suggesting that someone needs to regulate it, but that’d have to be the international, which is, as we saw with dual-use research to weaponize – oh, let’s say viruses – didn’t stop anyone (the US since GW Bush, for example) from pursuing biological weapons in foreign countries under the pretense of looking for cures to things our enemies might one-day produce.

Like heat waves in Europe?

All to mitigate a problem they created that doesn’t even exist.

And geoengineering is not a conspiracy theory. That is real.

 

Author

  • Steve MacDonald

    Steve is a long-time New Hampshire resident, award-winning blogger, and a member of the Board of Directors of The 603 Alliance. He is the owner of Grok Media LLC and the Managing Editor, Executive Editor, assistant editor, Editor, content curator, complaint department, Op-ed editor, gatekeeper (most likely to miss typos because he has no editor), and contributor at GraniteGrok.com. Steve is also a former board member of the Republican Liberty Caucus of New Hampshire, The Republican Volunteer Coalition, has worked for or with many state and local campaigns and grassroots groups, and is a past contributor to the Franklin Center for Public Policy.

    View all posts
Share to...